A text-to-SQL answer can run, return a plausible number and still compute something other than what the analyst meant. This can happen when the request leaves a calculation choice open, such as whether to count rows or distinct entities, and the model settles it without saying so. Standard benchmarks cannot detect this, because they score each question against a single reference interpretation. We introduce SpecBridge, which tests such a choice by varying it alone: it poses three otherwise identical requests, one leaving the choice open and one per interpretation, and scores each answer by running it. The databases are real, and the choices are ones that made models fail on existing benchmarks. On 204 hand-validated tests, four language models usually compute each interpretation when asked for it, yet for the open request return both in only 15-58% of the tests where they can, often without mentioning the choice. The gap lies in reporting, not in computing. Benchmarks even penalize the alternative: on BIRD questions where such a choice changes the answer, over two in five of the answers marked wrong are right under the other interpretation. Because the gap lies in reporting, a system can narrow it without a stronger model: it first decides whether a request leaves a choice open, then answers each interpretation in its own call. On our tests and on AMBROSIA, an existing benchmark of ambiguous questions, this approach raises the share of open requests that get every interpretation by 29-63 points over the single answer that production assistants give, without lowering precision on clear requests. It also needs fewer user turns than asking a clarifying question.
Research taste, the judgment of what to read, which problems to pursue, and which methods to try, increasingly shapes the work of AI scientists, yet it remains far less understood than their ability to execute research. We introduce IdeaTaste, a benchmark that scores an LLM by how closely the research proposals it writes from a literature snapshot frozen at 2025 match the work the same communities published in 2026. Our experiments span six contemporary language models and four research areas from established to emerging fields, covering more than 90{,}000 proposals in total. LLM agents fall well short of human communities in both the literature they cite and the ideas they state, reaching about 26\% of the human level on citation matching and only 18\% on idea matching. Their populations can cite as diversely as a community and take up its tasks and methods, yet rarely arrive at the concrete approaches and research plans it pursues. Neither richer field context nor larger populations substantially close this gap. In blinded expert review, AI proposals trail the 2026 papers least in presentation and most in expected success, echoing their gap in concrete approaches, and those whose ideas no human paper shares fare worst, suggesting weaker directions rather than overlooked opportunities. These results indicate that the main bottleneck in AI research taste lies less in finding the directions a community works on than in turning them into the concrete approaches it goes on to pursue. We release IdeaTaste as an open, continuously updated leaderboard (https://cxcscmu.github.io/IdeaTaste) that benchmarks contemporary AI proposals against future publication cycles.
Richard Yucheng He, Chen Xu, Yihang Liu, Tairan Chen, Baodong Cao
Most benchmarks for real-time voice systems focus on one aspect, such as turn-taking, instruction following, paralinguistic control, or conversational memory, each with its own data and set of systems. We present InteractionBench, a benchmark and evaluation harness that measures four dimensions on the same systems from the same recorded user audio: conversational timing, spoken-task accuracy, whisper and volume, and groundedness in conversations of more than twenty turns. The benchmark contains 221 items per system in thirteen scenarios. Before any system runs, we fix the expected floor-control actions for spoken tasks by rule and take the expected answers from scripted dialogues. We score whispering from the audio signal. We evaluate GPT-Live, GPT-Realtime, Gemini Live, Moshi, PersonaPlex, Freeze-Omni, and a turn-based cascade in 1,519 graded runs. Among the six full-duplex systems, timing and spoken-task accuracy are rank-correlated ($ρ= 0.83$), while the cascade has the highest spoken-task score (38/50) and the second-lowest timing score. No system corrects a user's grammar within the required window. Only Gemini Live whispers on most requests (8/10). Hosted systems pass 67-88% of groundedness probes, compared with 14-35% for open full-duplex models. Timing is measured where the client hears each system, so the timing of hosted systems includes network delay: for GPT-Live, whose server reports its own clock, removing a delay of about 1.5 s lowers its timing score from 86% to 56%. We also document where the protocol differs across systems, including the text instructions.
AI 速览：该研究考察由大生成模型构成的多智能体系统在共享资源竞争、顺序交接与集体决策等场景中自发出现的群体性失败模式。
Multi-agent systems composed of large generative models are rapidly moving from laboratory prototypes to real-world deployments, where they jointly plan, negotiate, and allocate shared resources to solve complex tasks. While such systems promise unprecedented scalability and autonomy, their collective interaction also gives rise to failure modes that cannot be reduced to individual agents. Understanding these emergent risks is therefore critical. Here, we present a pioneer study of such emergent multi-agent risk in workflows that involve competition over shared resources (e.g., computing resources or market share), sequential handoff collaboration (where downstream agents see only predecessor outputs), collective decision aggregation, and others. Across these settings, we observe that such group behaviors arise frequently across repeated trials and a wide range of interaction conditions, rather than as rare or pathological cases. In particular, phenomena such as collusion-like coordination and conformity emerge with non-trivial frequency under realistic resource constraints, communication protocols, and role assignments, mirroring well-known pathologies in human societies despite no explicit instruction. Moreover, these risks cannot be prevented by existing agent-level safeguards alone. These findings expose the dark side of intelligent multi-agent systems: a social intelligence risk where agent collectives, despite no instruction to do so, spontaneously reproduce familiar failure patterns from human societies.
Can AI agents autonomously train useful language models and improve them using feedback from users? We introduce RSI Arena, a two-stage study of autonomous post-training as a step toward recursive self-improvement. Ten frontier models act as training agents, each starting from NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base. During a six-day first stage, each agent has 1,000 GPU-hours and $300 in API credit on a shared 64-GPU cluster, independently selecting data, implementing training procedures, and choosing checkpoints. We evaluate their models on 20 benchmarks and through blind human evaluations. All ten agents produce working assistants, with the strongest model, trained by GPT-6 Astra, closing a median of 76% of the base-to-Instruct gap across 12 capability benchmarks. Its human-preference rating is also close to NVIDIA Instruct after statistical adjustment for answer length and formatting. In Stage 2, each agent receives the comparison records and votes involving its Stage 1 model and is given three additional days for further training. Using NVIDIA Instruct as a common reference across the two evaluation rounds, we observe an improvement from Stage 1 to Stage 2 in the style-adjusted relative rating of eight of the ten models. We show that benchmark gains were modest, with no clear link to preference gains, while some agents encouraged longer responses and one model showed increased harmful compliance on StrongREJECT. RSI Arena provides an auditable setting for studying how human feedback can guide autonomous model development. It takes a step toward recursive self-improvement with human feedback (RSIHF), in which people help define what improvement means for the AI systems they use.
Chen Xu, Yu Ji Beijing Institute of Technology, Zhenyu Lyu, Yang Yi, Yizhe Yang, Luyao Ji, Chaoyi Chen, Xianyang Wang 等 15 位作者
The critical therapist shortage demands scalable training solutions. Standardized Patients, the gold standard, are scarce and costly. Current LLM-based approaches focus on patient simulation for conversational realism but lack pedagogical rigor as Virtual Standardized Patients, lacking faithful reactions to clinical errors and explainable feedback. To bridge this gap, we propose PUPPET, the first neural-symbolic Virtual Standardized Patient governed by an OBSERVE-THINK-BEHAVE architecture. PUPPET externalizes LLM reasoning into a symbolic system where experts implant causal associations between intervention logic (propositional logic) and patient mental states (state machine). This allows PUPPET to behave coherently with controllable and explainable psychological dynamics: intervention logic (OBSERVE) → state transition (THINK) → response (BEHAVE). Our PUPPET-TRAINER further leverages this chain to educate trainees about intervention consequences, standardizing and scaling mental health training. Experiments across three clinical scenarios confirm that PUPPET outperforms baselines in clinical faithfulness and pedagogical value.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Yuetai Li, Zhangchen Xu, Fengqing Jiang Apple and University of Washington, Bhaskar Ramasubramanian Western Washington University, Luyao Niu University of Washington, Bill Yuchen Lin xAI and University of Washington, Xiang Yue Carnegie Mellon University, Radha Poovendran University of Washington, Seattle
Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) is intended to improve their reasoning capabilities, yet we uncover a counterintuitive effect: models often forget how to solve problems they previously answered correctly during training. We term this phenomenon Temporal Forgetting and show that it is widespread across model sizes, fine-tuning methods (both Reinforcement Learning and Supervised Fine-Tuning), and multiple reasoning benchmarks. Our analysis reveals on average more than 20% of final errors were once solved correctly at an earlier checkpoint. Inspired by the phenomenon of Temporal Forgetting, we proposed Temporal Sampling, a simple decoding strategy that draws outputs from multiple checkpoints along the training trajectory. This approach recovers forgotten solutions and leads to significant improvements in reasoning performance than final-ckpt-sampling only, gains from 4 to 19 points in Pass@k and consistent gains for majority-voting and Best-of-N across several benchmarks. Temporal sampling also outperforms strong baselines such as model merging. By leveraging the temporal diversity inherent in training, Temporal Sampling offers a practical, compute-efficient way to surface hidden reasoning ability and rethink how we evaluate LLMs.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Yichen Xu, Liangyu Chen Renmin University of China, Liang Zhang, Zihao Yue Renmin University of China, Jianzhe Ma Renmin University of China, Wenxuan Wang Renmin University of China, Qin Jin Renmin University of China
Charts are a universally adopted medium for data communication, yet existing chart understanding benchmarks are overwhelmingly English-centric, limiting their accessibility and relevance to global audiences. To address this limitation, we introduce PolyChartQA, the first large-scale multilingual benchmark for chart question answering, comprising 22,606 charts and 26,151 QA pairs across 10 diverse languages. PolyChartQA is constructed through a scalable pipeline that enables efficient multilingual chart generation via data translation and code reuse, supported by LLM-based translation and rigorous quality control. We systematically evaluate multilingual chart understanding with PolyChartQA on state-of-the-art LVLMs and reveal a significant performance gap between English and other languages, particularly low-resource ones. Additionally, we introduce a companion multilingual chart question answering training set, PolyChartQA-Train, on which fine-tuning LVLMs yields substantial gains in multilingual chart understanding across diverse model sizes and architectures. Together, our benchmark provides a foundation for developing globally inclusive vision-language models capable of understanding charts across diverse linguistic contexts. Codes and datasets are available on https://github.com/Road2Redemption/PolyChartQA.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Zi-Ao Ma, Xian-Ling Mao Beijing Institute of Technology, Tian Lan Alibaba Group, Chen Xu, Zhijing Wu Beijing Institute of Technology
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is crucial for the performance of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) but is often hindered by redundant and distracting segments, which incur excessive inference costs and degrade robustness. Existing approaches try to solve this problem by enforcing brevity through external supervision, such as length-based penalties or heuristic truncation. However, these approaches often degrade performance because they disregard the model’s intrinsic reasoning dependency and thus fail to distinguish between essential and redundant CoT segments. To address this problem, we propose SGP-CoT, a novel Self-Guided Pruning framework that leverages the model’s intrinsic likelihood landscape to identify segments that are extraneous to its specific reasoning pattern. Specifically, SGP-CoT treats the reasoning trajectory as a sequence of semantic units and assesses the necessity of each one via internal likelihood signals, measuring its contribution to the answer and local coherence. Based on this, it selectively removes non-essential segments and then forms high-quality pruning-based preference pairs, enabling the model to learn focused reasoning via self-optimization. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed SGP-CoT significantly reduces output length while maintaining or improving accuracy. These results validate that LRMs intrinsically possess the capability to discern reasoning utility, positioning SGP-CoT as a robust pathway toward scalable inference.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Bolun Sun, Charles Chang Duke Kunshan University, Yuen Yuen Ang Johns Hopkins University, Ruotong Mu, Yuchen Xu, Zhengxin Zhang, Pingxu Hao
We introduce CAPC-CG, the Chinese Adaptive Policy Communication (Central Government) Corpus, the first open dataset of Chinese policy directives annotated with a five-color typology of policy signals, capturing clarity and ambiguity, grounded in the theory of adaptive policy communication. Spanning 1949–2023, this corpus includes laws, regulations, and rules issued by Chinese central authorities, segmented into 3.3 million paragraph units. We further propose and validate an expert-directed LLM annotation method that integrates codebook design, structured training, a two-step workflow, and LLM-based scaling. Alongside the corpus, we release metadata and a gold-standard labeled set developed by trained coders. Inter-annotator agreement achieves a Fleiss’ kappa of κ = 0.86 on directive labels, indicating high reliability. We provide baseline classification results with several large language models (LLMs), together with our codebook, and describe patterns from the data. This release enables downstream tasks and multilingual NLP research in communication strategies under complexity and uncertainty.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Yuechen Jiang, Zhiwei Liu, Yupeng Cao, Yueru He Columbia University, Ziyang Xu, Chen Xu, Zhiyang Deng, Prayag Tiwari Halmstad University 等 13 位作者
We introduce RFC-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating large language models on financial misinformation under realistic news. RFC-Bench operates at the paragraph level and captures the contextual complexity of financial news where meaning emerges from dispersed cues. The benchmark defines two complementary tasks: reference-free misinformation detection and comparison-based diagnosis using paired original–perturbed inputs. Experiments reveal a consistent pattern: performance is substantially stronger when comparative context is available, while reference-free settings expose significant weaknesses, including unstable predictions and elevated invalid outputs. These results indicate that current models struggle to maintain coherent belief states without external grounding. By highlighting this gap, RFC-Bench provides a structured testbed for studying reference-free reasoning and advancing more reliable financial misinformation detection in real-world settings.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Zhuohan Xie Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, Daniil Orel, Rushil Thareja, Dhruv Sahnan, Hachem Madmoun Imperial College London, Fan Zhang, Debopriyo Banerjee G42, Georgi Nenkov Georgiev 等 25 位作者
Multi-step symbolic reasoning is essential for robust financial analysis; yet, current benchmarks largely overlook this capability. Existing datasets such as FinQA and ConvFinQA emphasize final numerical answers while neglecting the intermediate reasoning steps required for transparency and verification. To address this gap, we introduce FinChain, the first benchmark specifically designed for verifiable Chain-of-Thought evaluation in finance. FinChain spans 58 topics across 12 financial domains, each represented by parameterized symbolic templates with executable Python code that enable fully machine-verifiable reasoning and scalable, contamination-free data generation.To assess reasoning capacity, we propose ChainEval, a dynamic alignment measure that jointly evaluates both the final-answer correctness and the step-level reasoning consistency. Our evaluation of 26 leading LLMs reveals that even frontier LLMs exhibit clear limitations in symbolic financial reasoning, while domain-adapted and math-enhanced fine-tuned models can substantially narrow this gap.Overall, FinChain exposes persistent weaknesses in multi-step financial reasoning and provides a foundation for developing trustworthy, interpretable, and verifiable financial AI. This project is available at https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/finchain.git.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表