跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 06:13 — 2026-11-16 06:13(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05596

RAGCompass: Generalizable Retriever Routing via Reranking

Valentin Six, Mufei Li, Dongqi Fu, Yinglong Xia, Hong Li, Pan Li

原文摘要

Different retrievers exist for retrieval-augmented generation, yet none performs best for all queries. Therefore, the key question is: given a query and retrieved passages from different retrievers, which one is most suited for that query? Existing routers usually make predictions from query-specific features and a fixed pool of retrievers; such routers have no output for an unseen retriever and are incapable by design on a new corpus. To fill these gaps, RAGCompass reads the retrieved passage sets themselves: passages from an unfamiliar retriever or corpus stay directly comparable to other passages, so routing stays well designed where a query-only map would fail. We contrastively fine-tune a reranker against the answer each evidence set produces, which accounts for most of the gain; a small comparison head adds a moderate improvement, and neither component has retriever-specific parameters. RAGCompass improves answer F1 by 28% relative to the best fixed retriever, and outperforms fusion baselines, three query-only routers, and a prompted 8B language model. Generalization experiments show that RAGCompass keeps most of its gain under an unseen corpus, retriever, or reader, while query-only baselines fall to the best fixed retriever or below.

cs.CL · cs.IR

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-demo.54ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

PhyVer: Physics-Grounded Material Claim Verification with Multi-Fidelity Physical Evidence

Jianpeng Chen, Wangzhi Zhan Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Haohui Wang, Brian Mayer Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Dongqi Fu Meta, Dawei Zhou Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

原文摘要

Material claims in papers, patents, etc., often involve physical feasibility (e.g., stability under conditions, property consistency), not just textual feasibility. Yet most claim verifiers operate over language, therefore producing ungrounded judgments. On the other hand, directfirst-principles verification (e.g., density functional theory, DFT) is inflexible and hard to invoke from underspecified free-form claims.Therefore, we introduce PhyVer, a physics-grounded material claim verification system that bridges this gap by translating claimsinto multi-fidelity physical evidence and interpretable verdicts. To support human-in-the-loop inspection, we present an interactive web interface that visualizes the instantiated structure, optimization trajectories, DFT summaries, and the final decision. On expert-labeled claims, PhyVer improves agreement with experts over text-only GPT-5.1, reducing MAE from 1.54 to 1.20 and Signed MAE from0.95 to 0.82, and increasing Accuracy@±1 from 50% to 70%.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 3: System Demonstrations) · 2026 · 正式发表