Jin Zhao, Marta Knežević School of Computer and Communication Sciences, EPFL - EPF Lausanne, Tanja Käser EPFL
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in education, yet their default helpfulness often conflicts with pedagogical principles. Prior work evaluates pedagogical quality via answer leakage–the disclosure of complete solutions instead of scaffolding–but typically assumes well-intentioned learners, leaving tutor robustness under student misuse largely unexplored. In this paper, we study scenarios where students behave adversarially and aim to obtain the correct answer from the tutor. We evaluate a broad set of LLM-based tutor models, including different model families, pedagogically aligned models, and a multi-agent design, under a range of adversarial student attacks. We adapt six groups of adversarial and persuasive techniques to the educational setting and use them to probe how likely a tutor is to reveal the final answer. We evaluate answer leakage robustness using different types of in-context adversarial student agents, finding that they often fail to carry out effective attacks. We therefore introduce an adversarial student agent that we fine-tune to jailbreak LLM-based tutors, which we propose as the core of a standardized benchmark for evaluating tutor robustness. Finally, we present simple but effective defense strategies that reduce answer leakage and strengthen the robustness of LLM-based tutors in adversarial scenarios.
尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.MA
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Jin Zhao, Jiayi Yao University of Washington, Xinrui Hu, Nianwen Xue Brandeis University
Causal explanations in political narratives are often framed and contested. Different sources may explain the same event by assigning responsibility to different actors and expressing varying levels of certainty. Standard Event Causality Identification (ECI) focuses on detecting causal links and does not capture these distinctions. We introduce Framing-Aware Event Causality Identification (FrECI), a framing-aware extension of ECI that models causal explanations as structured claims including responsibility targets, evaluative framing, source type, and epistemic modality grounded in established framing theories. We construct a multilingual dataset aligned across English, Chinese, and Arabic narratives using shared event anchors. We evaluate FrECI using prompt-based large language model baselines and supervised neural models. Results show that prompt-based baselines struggle to recover complete framed causal claims, while joint supervised models perform substantially better. Finally, we demonstrate that FrECI enables quantitative analysis of divergent causal attribution across narratives.
尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Xinyu Li, Kexi Chen, Jiajie Shen Fudan University, Ying Zheng, Hong Lu Fudan University, Jin Zhao Fudan University, Xin Wang Fudan University
In multivariate long-term time series forecasting, it is widely believed that the effectiveness of self-attention arises from its attention matrix. We challenge this assumption with a counterintuitive finding: our experiments, conducted on three classic and three latest Transformer models, show that dot-product attention can be replaced by element-wise operations without token interaction, such as the addition and Hadamard product, while maintaining or even improving accuracy. This leads to our central hypothesis: the effectiveness of self-attention in this task stems not from the dynamic attention matrix, but from the multi-branch feature extraction inherent in the parallel projections to Query, Key, and Value matrices and their fusion. To validate this, we construct a simple multi-branch MLP that isolates the ‘multi-branch mapping with element-wise operation’ structure from the Transformer and show that it achieves competitive performance. Our results indicate that the source of performance in self-attention has been misattributed, suggesting that the true benefit lies in the architectural principle of multi-branch mapping and fusion, not in the attention matrix.
尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表