跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+3538新增论文
+2651其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+61新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-04 23:44 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 00:35各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 00:37 — 2026-11-05 00:37(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-04 23:44最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 00:35库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

12,215 已收录论文10,326 AI 相关3,088 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-04 23:39(北京时间)
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.486ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

InstructDiff: Domain-Adaptive Data Selection via Contrastive Entropy for Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning

Junyou Su, He Zhu, Xiao Luo University of Wisconsin - Madison, Liyu Zhang, Hong-Yu Zhou, Yun Chen Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Peng Li Tsinghua University, Yang Liu 等 9 位作者

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is fundamental to adapting large language models, yet training on complete datasets incurs prohibitive costs with diminishing returns. Existing data selection methods suffer from severe domain specificity: techniques optimized for general instruction-following fail on reasoning tasks, and vice versa. We observe that measuring contrastive entropy between base models and minimally instruction-tuned calibrated models reveals a pattern—samples with the lowest contrastive entropy consistently yield optimal performance across domains, yet this principle manifests domain-adaptively: reasoning tasks favor entropy increase (cognitive expansion), while general tasks favor entropy decrease (cognitive compression). We introduce InstructDiff, a unified framework that operationalizes contrastive entropy as a domain-adaptive selection criterion through warmup calibration, bi-directional NLL filtering, and entropy-based ranking. Extensive experiments show that InstructDiff achieves 17% relative improvement over full data training on mathematical reasoning and 52% for general instruction-following, outperforming prior baselines while using only 10% of the data.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗