跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+3已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-14 20:22 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-13 20:29 — 2026-11-14 20:29(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-14 20:22最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 4 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-14 20:20(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.13975

Understanding Mixture-of-Experts Language Models Beyond Expert Boundaries

Zhenhong Zhou, Mao Zheng, Mingyang Song, Qiankun Li, Kun Wang, Junfeng Fang

原文摘要

In Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models, the nature of expert specialization remains controversial. Reports of domain-associated expert preferences contrast with analyses attributing routing primarily to token identity or syntactic patterns. To clarify these differing accounts, we look beyond expert-level routing to investigate the neuron-level organization of domain-specialized computation using Routing-Aware Magnitude Profiling (RAMP), a measure developed for this analysis. Using mixed-domain calibration data, we identify domain-specialized neuron sets with 58-74% overlap across multi-source samples of the same domain, compared with 15-24% across domains. To understand how this organization evolves during training, we trace neuron importance throughout pre-training and post-training across three fully open MoE families. Neuron importance continues to reorganize between pre-training checkpoints despite comparatively stable expert-level importance rankings, while post-training largely preserves neuron rankings. Building on these neuron-level perspectives, we further introduce RAMP-based Pruning (RAMPr) to select neurons across experts for balanced multi-domain capability preservation. At 75% neuron retention, RAMPr preserves average 91-98% of original full performance across six models. At 50% retention, our pruning method can reduce resident GPU memory by 36-43% and improves batched prefill throughput by 17-39% effectively. Our code is available at https://github.com/ydyjya/Neuron-Level-Specialization-in-MoE

cs.AI · cs.CL

版本更新 · v3arXiv:2610.35826

Understanding Jev-Style System One Models: Does Structure Reduce Selection Bias?

Mingyang Song, Mao Zheng, Zhiyuan Ma, Xinpeng Zhou

原文摘要

Selection bias in large language models (LLMs) can persist despite instructions to ignore presentation order or prompts that elicit reasoning. Recent efforts to reproduce Jev-style System One behavior have produced a growing family of models that predict probabilities directly over supplied candidates. Yet systematic comparisons of selection bias across Jev versions, Jev reproductions, and generative LLMs remain limited in multi-option tasks. This leaves a central question: does Jev-style decision structure reduce selection bias? We address this question with a simple test that shuffles options while keeping question and candidate content fixed. Across two Jev versions, twelve Jev reproductions, and six generative LLMs, we trace individual answers through eight presentations and compare them with fixed-order repetition. On our primary collection of 1,700 questions from two benchmarks, Jev's accuracy varies by less than two percentage points, yet its cumulative failure set expands by 27.3-28.5% relative to the original order, with first failures continuing into the final presentation. Reordering loses substantially more initial successes than fixed-order repetition, a gap that also appears in highly repeatable Jev reproductions. Nor does Jev show a general advantage over the LLM baselines in preserving correct choices. Aggregation offers limited protection: voting yields modest gains for Jev, while even unanimous answers are frequently wrong. These results expose a gap between repeatable decisions and decisions that remain correct across equivalent presentations, showing why stable accuracy alone cannot establish resistance to selection bias.

cs.CL

版本更新 · v4arXiv:2606.04874

Agent Planning Benchmark: A Diagnostic Framework for Planning Capabilities in LLM Agents

Haoyu Sun, Wenxuan Wang, Mingyang Song, Jujie He, Weinan Zhang, Yang Liu, Yang Yang, Yu Cheng

原文摘要

Planning is central to LLM agents: before acting, an agent must decompose goals, select tools, reason over constraints, and decide when a task is infeasible. Yet existing agent evaluations often report only end-to-end success, making it difficult to determine whether failures stem from planning or execution. We introduce Agent Planning Benchmark (APB), a planning-specific diagnostic benchmark with 4,209 multimodal cases across 22 domains and five settings, covering holistic planning, feedback-conditioned step-wise planning, and robustness under extraneous tools, broken tools, and unsolvable tasks. Across 12 MLLMs, APB reveals systematic weaknesses in long-horizon planning, tool-noise robustness, calibrated refusal, and inference-time refinement. We further validate APB on 200 ToolSandbox tasks and 200 $τ^2$-bench tasks, where APB-guided refinement consistently improves plan correctness, plan grade, and downstream execution metrics across three representative models. APB thus serves as an upstream diagnostic complement to execution benchmarks. The APB benchmark and code are available in \href{https://github.com/Mikivishy/AgentPlanningBenchmark}{this URL}.

cs.CL

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.2019ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

PodBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Instruction-Aware Audio-Oriented Podcast Script Generation

Chenning Xu Tencent Hunyuan Team, Mao Zheng, Mingyu Zheng, Mingyang Song Tencent

原文摘要

Podcast script generation requires LLMs to synthesize structured, context-grounded dialogue from diverse inputs, yet systematic evaluation resources for this task remain limited. To bridge this gap, we introduce PodBench, a benchmark comprising 800 samples with inputs up to 21K tokens and complex multi-speaker instructions. We propose a multifaceted evaluation framework that integrates quantitative constraints with LLM-based quality assessment. Extensive experiments reveal that while proprietary models generally excel, open-source models equipped with explicit reasoning demonstrate superior robustness in handling long contexts and multi-speaker coordination compared to standard baselines. However, our analysis uncovers a persistent divergence where high instruction following does not guarantee high content substance. PodBench offers a reproducible testbed to address these challenges in long-form, audio-centric script generation.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表