Qiming Shi, Yikun Li, Beidi Luan, Rui Sun, Sinuo Wang, Delin Wang, Yan Ma, Jing Li 等 10 位作者
Large language model (LLM) agents are extending agent-mediated commerce on the Web from shopping for consumers to operating businesses for sellers. In online-to-offline (O2O) commerce, decisions are issued through Web-based platforms but realized through costly physical execution. Evaluating such agents requires going beyond individual transactions to ask whether decisions made online turn into sustained economic returns. We introduce AutoVend, a benchmark in which one LLM agent manages 20 vending machines across five site types through a Web-based operating interface for 180 simulated days. Its data-grounded simulator combines a shared warehouse, procurement lead times, paid replenishment, inventory expiration, and recurring operating costs. We evaluate five LLM agents against a rule-based inventory-control baseline and diagnose their site coordination, execution, and performance over time. Four of five evaluated LLM agents fall short of this baseline, and returns per dollar of inference cost rank models differently from returns alone. Operational analyses show that gains in individual metrics do not consistently yield stronger economic growth, as inventory and execution costs erode these gains. Trajectory analysis further reveals difficulties in grounding feasible actions, managing inventory commitments, and converting feedback into effective policy revisions.
Deep research agents conduct multi-step Web searches and synthesise retrieved information into analytical reports. Evaluating these outputs requires checking which analyses they deliver, beyond the presence of relevant facts. Query-specific binary rubrics make individual requirements explicit, but task-level checklists may leave the overall analytical structure underexamined. We introduce RubricAtlas, which derives type-level analytical requirements from expert reports on different objects within the same research type and organises detailed checks around recurring analytical questions. The requirements give related tasks a shared standard for what to analyse, without prescribing their answers. Our framework links binary checkpoints to report passages and evaluates completeness separately from argument validity. Built from 3,079 Chinese financial research reports, RubricAtlas covers 99 research types. Reference-report selection experiments show that individual reports cover only about half of their type's analytical questions, and that selecting requirements from different reports changes evaluation scores and agent rankings. Across ten agents, two judge pipelines achieve checkpoint agreement of $κ$ = 0.71 and agent-ranking agreement of Kendall $τ$ = 0.87. Controlled deletions reduce scores on the affected analyses, while padding produces no detectable increase. These findings support type-level rubrics for comparing the analytical completeness of Web deep research outputs, with individual decisions traceable to report evidence.
Jiuheng Lin, Cong Jiang, Zirui Wu Peking University, Jiarui Sun Peking University, Yansong Feng Peking University
Training expert LLMs in domains with scarce fine-grained annotated data is admittedly challenging, often relying on multiple-choice questions (MCQs). However, standard outcome-based reinforcement learning (RL) on MCQs is risky. While outcome-based RL may improve accuracy, it frequently compromises the reasoning process, yielding internally inconsistent rationales that diverge from the final predictions. Existing solutions to supervise the reasoning process, such as large-scale Process Reward Models (PRMs), are prohibitively expensive. To address this, we propose CLARity, a cost-effective RL framework that enhances reasoning quality using a small, general-purpose LLM only. CLARity integrates a consistency-aware reward mechanism with a 2-stage refine-then-monitor training pipeline to enhance reasoning consistency, and a dynamic data reformulation strategy to better exploit annotated data available. Experiments demonstrate that CLARity can improve the consistency of responses by 16.5% over standard outcome-based RL, and bring an improvement of 7.5% in final accuracy. Human evaluations further confirm substantial gains in factual correctness and reasoning coherence, leading to more trustworthy model outputs. Thus, CLARity offers a generalizable solution that enables smaller models to effectively guide expert LLM training by monitoring reasoning consistency.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表