跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文，按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描：2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库：2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 07:19 — 2026-11-16 07:19（北京时间） · 点击数字查看对应简报；AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查：2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本：2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间：2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常；新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

研究日报 / 周报 →按信源浏览 →

时间范围跟随排序：版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常，查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33（北京时间）
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-demo.70ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

ThinkBooster: A Unified Framework for Seamless Test-Time Scaling of LLM Reasoning

Vladislav Smirnov, Quang-Chieu Nguyen, Sergey Senichev MTS AI and ITMO University, Minh Ngoc Ta, Ekaterina Fadeeva ETHZ - ETH Zurich, Artem Vazhentsev Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence and Independent Researcher, Daria Galimzianova Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, Nikolai Rozanov 等 17 位作者

原文摘要

Test-time compute (TTC) scaling has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving large language model (LLM) reasoning by allocating additional compute during inference, e.g., via multi-sample generation and verifier-based reranking. Existing TTC scaling strategies and reasoning scorers remain fragmented, evaluated under inconsistent protocols, and are rarely analyzed through the lens of quality-cost trade-offs. We introduce ThinkBooster, a unified framework for seamless test-time compute scaling of LLM reasoning, which consists of (i) a modular Python library implementing state-of-the-art TTC scaling strategy and scorer families, (ii) a benchmark that jointly evaluates performance and computational efficiency, and (iii) a deployable OpenAI-compatible proxy service that enables drop-in integration of adaptive reasoning into real-world applications. We further provide a demo visual debugger for inspecting the reasoning trajectories, intermediate selection decisions, and alternative reasoning paths. Empirical results on mathematical and coding tasks reveal the performance-compute trade-offs of TTC scaling strategies and scoring methods and demonstrate that ThinkBooster provides practical gains in real-world tasks. The code is available online under an MIT license.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 3: System Demonstrations) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.2204ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

A Multilingual Social Bias Benchmark Incorporating Thinking Processes

Masahiro Kaneko NII LLMC and Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, Danushka Bollegala Amazon and University of Liverpool, Timothy Baldwin Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence and The University of Melbourne

原文摘要

Large Language Models (LLMs) can learn both useful knowledge and harmful stereotypes, making bias evaluation essential.Existing frameworks fall into two types: those considering reasoning steps (Thinking Process-Aware Evaluation, TPAE) and those focusing only on final outputs (Straight-to-the-Answer Evaluation, SAE).Prior TPAE studies showed effectiveness in assessing gender bias but relied on template-based, word-counting prompts, limiting generalization to other bias types, languages, and reasoning-based methods.In this study, we introduce MBTP, a multilingual social bias benchmark that incorporates human-generated pro- and anti-stereotype reasoning as part of the thinking process, and propose a few-shot meta-evaluation method that enables scalable bias assessment without model fine-tuning.From experiments evaluating 13 social bias categories across 8 languages, we find that human-generated thinking consistently yields higher-quality evaluations than LLM-generated or template-based approaches.Furthermore, TPAE demonstrates superior performance over SAE, highlighting the importance of considering reasoning processes in bias evaluation.We will release the MBTP dataset upon paper acceptance.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.536ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

ReProbe: Efficient Test-Time Scaling of Multi-Step Reasoning by Probing Internal States of Large Language Models

Jingwei Ni ETHZ - ETH Zurich, Ekaterina Fadeeva ETHZ - ETH Zurich, Tianyi Wu, Mubashara Akhtar ETHZ - ETH Zurich, Jiaheng Zhang National University of Singapore, Elliott Ash Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Markus Leippold University of Zurich, Timothy Baldwin Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence and The University of Melbourne 等 11 位作者

原文摘要

LLMs can solve complex tasks by generating long, multi-step reasoning chains. Test-time scaling (TTS) can further improve LLM performance by sampling multiple variants of intermediate reasoning steps, verifying their correctness, and strategically choosing the best steps for continuation. However, existing verification approaches, such as Process Reward Models (PRMs), are computationally expensive, limited to specific domains, and require large-scale human or model-generated annotations. We propose a lightweight alternative for step-level reasoning verification based on probing the internal states of LLMs. We train a transformer-based probe that uses the internal states of the frozen LLM to estimate the credibility of its reasoning steps during generation. Annotation can be generated either by another larger LLM (e.g., DeepSeek-R1) or in a self-supervised manner by the original model itself. The probes are both effective and lightweight, containing fewer than 10M parameters. Across multiple domains, including mathematics, planning, and general knowledge question answering, our probes match or even exceed the performance of PRMs that are up to 810× larger. Our findings suggest that the internal states of LLMs encode their confidence in reasoning processes and can serve as reliable signals for reasoning step verification, offering a promising direction towards scalable and generalizable TTS and introspective LLMs.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表