Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in vision-language understanding, yet how they internally integrate visual and textual information remains poorly understood. To bridge this gap, we perform a systematic layer-wise masking analysis across multiple architectures, revealing how visual-text fusion evolves within MLLMs. The results show that fusion emerges at several specific layers rather than being uniformly distributed across the network, and certain models exhibit a late-stage "review" phenomenon where visual signals are reactivated before output generation. Besides, we further analyze layer-wise attention evolution and observe persistent high-attention noise on irrelevant regions, along with gradually increasing attention on text-aligned areas. Guided by these insights, we introduce a training-free contrastive attention framework that models the transformation between early fusion and final layers to highlight meaningful attention shifts. Extensive experiments across various MLLMs and benchmarks validate our analysis and demonstrate that the proposed approach improves multimodal reasoning performance.Code will be released.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CV · cs.CL
Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2026 · 正式发表
Humanoid robots have achieved significant progress in motion generation and control, exhibiting movements that appear increasingly natural and human-like. Inspired by the Turing Test, we propose the Motion Turing Test, a framework that evaluates whether human observers can discriminate between humanoid robot and human poses using only kinematic information. To facilitate this evaluation, we present the Human-Humanoid Motion (HHMotion) dataset, which consists of 1,000 motion sequences spanning 15 action categories, performed by 11 humanoid models and 10 human subjects. All motion sequences are converted into SMPL-X representations to eliminate the influence of visual appearance. We recruited 30 annotators to rate the human-likeness of each pose on a 0-5 scale, resulting in over 500 hours of annotation. Analysis of the collected data reveals that humanoid motions still exhibit noticeable deviations from human movements, particularly in dynamic actions such as jumping, boxing, and running. Building on HHMotion, we formulate a human-likeness evaluation task that aims to automatically predict human-likeness scores from motion data. Despite recent progress in multimodal large language models, we find that they remain inadequate for assessing motion human-likeness. To address this, we propose a simple baseline model and demonstrate that it outperforms several contemporary LLM-based methods. The dataset, code, and benchmark release publicly at http://www.lidarhumanmotion.net/mtt/
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CV · cs.CL
Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2026 · 正式发表
Peng, Zhihao, Wang, Cheng, Liu, Shengyuan, Liang, Zhiying, Ye, Zanting, Ju, Min Jie, Woo, Peter YM, Yuan, Yixuan
Brain imaging analysis is crucial for diagnosing and treating brain disorders, and multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly supporting it. However, current brain imaging visual question-answering (VQA) benchmarks either cover a limited number of imaging modalities or are restricted to coarse-grained pathological descriptions, hindering a comprehensive assessment of MLLMs across the full clinical continuum. To address these, we introduce OmniBrainBench, the first comprehensive multimodal VQA benchmark specifically designed to assess the multimodal comprehension capabilities of MLLMs in brain imaging analysis with closed- and open-ended evaluations. OmniBrainBench comprises 15 distinct brain imaging modalities collected from 30 verified medical sources, yielding 9,527 validated VQA pairs and 31,706 images. It simulates clinical workflows and encompasses 15 multi-stage clinical tasks rigorously validated by a professional radiologist. Evaluations of 24 state-of-the-art models, including open-source general-purpose, medical, and proprietary MLLMs, highlight the substantial challenges posed by OmniBrainBench. Experiments reveal that proprietary MLLMs like Gemini-2.5-Pro (66.58%) outperform open-source and medical MLLMs yet lag far behind physicians (91.35%), while medical MLLMs show wide variance in closed- and open-ended VQA. Open-source general-purpose MLLMs generally trail but excel in specific tasks, and all MLLMs fall short in complex preoperative reasoning, revealing a critical visual-to-clinical gap. OmniBrainBench establishes a new standard to assess MLLMs in brain imaging analysis, highlighting the gaps against physicians. We publicly release our benchmark and code at link.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CV · cs.CL
Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2026 · 正式发表