Multimodal large language models can recognize visual content yet struggle to reason reliably over it across multiple steps. In counting, a model may see all objects but lose track of which ones it has counted. We argue that such failures, commonly attributed to perception, reveal a reference gap: the failure to bind language to the relevant visual entities, regions, or locations. Motivated by the theory of visual routines, we test whether external references such as numbering can narrow this gap. We introduce ReGap-Bench, a paired benchmark of five visual reasoning tasks in which the scene, question, and answer are fixed and only the reference varies. Results show that task-matched references improve accuracy by up to 25\%, while mismatched references provide little benefit or even hurt performance. These findings identify the reference gap as a bottleneck distinct from visual perception and show that constructing task-appropriate visual references can serve as a training-free visual skill for improving multimodal reasoning.
We study amplitude-only rescaling of feed-forward network (FFN) activations to repair tool calls and other structured outputs, using multiplicative coordinate masks rather than additive steering vectors. Amplitude Gating (AG) keeps pretrained weights fixed and applies magnitude/entropy-based masks at six SwiGLU sites, with a Newton-Schulz windowed ranking variant. Across three Qwen checkpoints and six text/tool endpoints, effects are task dependent. Under frozen local scorers, Qwen3.5-9B non-NS configurations improve two function-call endpoints by +2.61/+2.67 percentage points (pp) and static ToolBench in/out-domain by +1.64/+2.82 pp; JSON gains are small. These gains survive comparing the weaker of two observed AG runs with the stronger baseline, supporting observed-run robustness rather than population significance. Scores measure lexical or answer/action-name agreement, not executed-tool success. Under the current experimental conditions, the six-task random-forest refit improves native score by +0.46 pp with a positive conditional paired interval; transfer to other settings requires further evaluation. The results support task-specific interventions; causal mechanisms, equal-budget advantages, repeated-run uncertainty, and serving cost require further evaluation. Code and experimental data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23654706.