Social media enables cross-lingual communication, yet the meaning of user-generated content (UGC) is often distributed across text, images, and cultural knowledge, making translation challenging. Existing evaluations typically treat images as optional and assume textual information is sufficient, obscuring whether errors stem from missing visual evidence or inadequate cultural adaptation. We introduce \textbf{Culture-MMT}, a diagnostic benchmark for \textbf{distributed-evidence pragmatic reconstruction} in social-media translation. It contains 498 curated, de-identified UGC instances across 20 domains, categorized into Symbol, Visual, and Hybrid by their required evidence. We also develop a human-aligned domain-specific judge, Judger, and a controlled evaluation framework that systematically varies the evidence available to translators. Across 17 model configurations, real images improve performance by +0.280 on Visual and +0.197 on Hybrid, but only +0.050 on Symbol, while random images provide no comparable gains. Human-authored descriptions further show that jointly dependent cases remain more challenging even when visual facts are explicit. These results characterize culturally effective social-media translation as {meaning reconstruction from distributed evidence}, highlighting visual grounding and cultural-pragmatic adaptation as distinct model bottlenecks.
Baoyu Jing, Zixuan Wang, Junwen Chen, Xin Dong, Bingfeng Deng
Large-scale integrity enforcement on short-form video platforms typically relies on multiple specialized vertical modules, each dedicated to a specific risk category. However, exhaustively executing these computationally intensive modules over massive content streams leads to substantial inference overhead, despite the fact that most content is benign and violations are usually confined to limited policy domains. To address this inefficiency, we propose RADAR, a lightweight risk-aware routing framework that selectively releases low-risk content while dispatching high-risk instances to appropriate vertical modules. Industrial deployment of such routing systems presents two major challenges: (1) systematic label sparsity caused by disjoint annotation pipelines across risk categories, and (2) the capacity-efficiency tradeoff inherent to compact routing architectures. To overcome these challenges, RADAR incorporates Validity-Aware Masking to handle fragmented supervision and Expert-Guided Knowledge Distillation to transfer knowledge from heavyweight expert models into the lightweight router. Experiments on large-scale real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed masking strategy effectively mitigates disjoint annotation issues, while distillation substantially enhances routing accuracy, enabling the lightweight router to achieve competitive or superior performance compared to specialized expert models.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 6: Industry Track) · 2026 · 正式发表
Yu Lei, Zixuan Wang, Yiqing Feng, Junru Zhang, Yahui Li, Liu Chu, Wang Tongyao, Dongyang Li
Recent industrial credit scoring models remain heavily reliant on manually tuned statistical learning methods. Despite their potential, deep learning architectures have struggled to consistently outperform traditional statistical models in industrial credit scoring, largely due to the complexity of heterogeneous financial data and the challenge of modeling evolving creditworthiness. To bridge this gap, we introduce FinLangNet, a novel framework that reformulates credit scoring as a multi-scale sequential learning problem. FinLangNet processes heterogeneous financial data through a dual-module architecture that combines tabular feature extraction with temporal sequence modeling, generating probability distributions of users’ future financial behaviors across multiple time horizons. A key innovation is our dual-prompt mechanism within the sequential module, which introduces learnable prompts operating at both feature-level granularity for capturing fine-grained temporal patterns and user-level granularity for aggregating holistic risk profiles. Notably, real world deployment yielded a 6.3 pp improvement in KS, along with a 9.9% reduction in bad debt rate.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 6: Industry Track) · 2026 · 正式发表
Teng Pan, Yuchen Yan Zhejiang University, Zixuan Wang Zhejiang University and Baidu, Ruiqing Zhang, Guiyang Hou, Wenqi Zhang Zhejiang University, Weiming Lu Zhejiang University, Jun Xiao Zhejiang University 等 9 位作者
Label-free reinforcement learning enables large language models to improve reasoning capabilities without ground-truth supervision, typically by treating majority-voted answers as pseudo-labels. However, we identify a critical failure mode: as training maximizes self-consistency, output diversity collapses, causing the model to confidently reinforce systematic errors that evade detection. We term this the consensus trap. To escape it, we propose CoVerRL, a framework where a single model alternates between generator and verifier roles, with each capability bootstrapping the other. Majority voting provides noisy but informative supervision for training the verifier, while the improving verifier progressively filters self-consistent errors from pseudo-labels. This co-evolution creates a virtuous cycle that maintains high reward accuracy throughout training. Experiments across Qwen and Llama model families demonstrate that CoVerRL outperforms label-free baselines by 4.7-5.9% on mathematical reasoning benchmarks. Moreover, self-verification accuracy improves from around 55% to over 85%, confirming that both capabilities genuinely co-evolve.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Logical reasoning serves as a central capability in LLMs and includes three main forms: deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning. In this work, we study the knowledge representations of these reasoning types in LLMs and analyze the correlations among them. Our analysis shows that each form of logical reasoning can be captured as a reasoning-specific knowledge vector in a linear representation space, yet these vectors are largely independent of each other. Motivated by cognitive science theory that these subforms of logical reasoning interact closely in the human brain, as well as our observation that the reasoning process for one type can benefit from the reasoning chain produced by another, we further propose to refine the knowledge representations of each reasoning type in LLMs to encourage complementarity between them. To this end, we design a complementary subspace-constrained refinement framework, which introduces a complementary loss that enables each reasoning vector to leverage auxiliary knowledge from the others, and a subspace constraint loss that prevents erasion of their unique characteristics. Through steering experiments along reasoning vectors, we find that refined vectors incorporating complementary knowledge yield consistent performance gains. We also conduct a mechanism-interpretability analysis of each reasoning vector, revealing insights into the shared and specific features of different reasoning in LLMs.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表