跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+6109新增论文
+5222其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 06:01 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 06:17各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 06:39 — 2026-11-05 06:39(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 06:01最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 06:17库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

14,786 已收录论文12,897 AI 相关3,089 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 05:58(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.03646

EgoActionBench: Benchmarking Dense Action Captioning for Egocentric Human Videos

Yujiao Shen, Jiahe Song, Haitian Li, Jingkang Yang, Ziwei Liu

Learning from human data offers a scalable path toward embodied intelligence, yet it requires models to accurately understand fine-grained human actions from egocentric observations. However, existing benchmarks remain limited in action atomicity, temporal precision, and hand-action association. We introduce EgoActionBench, a benchmark that represents continuous human manipulation as temporally localized atomic actions associated with the left hand, right hand, or both hands. EgoActionBench contains 1,407 episodes with 41,132 human-refined action annotations. To evaluate such dense predictions, we propose an evaluation protocol that retrieves temporally eligible candidates, selects a prediction by content agreement, and scores semantic fidelity and temporal overlap alongside action precision and recall, jointly capturing what happens, when it happens, and which hand performs it. We benchmark 20 baseline models and systems on EgoActionBench and further adapt two backbones, Qwen3-VL-4B and LLaVA-OneVision-2-8B, through supervised fine-tuning followed by reinforcement learning on automatically annotated training episodes. EgoAction improves EgoActionScore by 15.9 and 23.2 points on the two backbones, and both adapted models outperform all open-source baselines. Our experiments reveal substantial limitations of current models in action atomicity, temporal precision, and hand-action association, highlighting the gap between general video understanding and the action understanding required for embodied intelligence.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗