Dynamic 3D Gaussian splats (3DGS) model time-varying scenes using a separate Gaussian set per frame. While neighboring video frames are highly correlated due to smooth motion, Gaussian representations retain this correlation to varying degrees, depending on whether the estimator tracks them across time. Some 3DGS compression methods integrate the estimation to exploit temporal redundancy; here, we focus on robust compression regardless of the estimator. We concatenate groups of frames into one Gaussian set, augment each Gaussian with a frame index, and pass it to a static (i.e., non-temporal) 3DGS codec, converting temporal redundancy into spatial redundancy. Concatenated sets are spatially partitioned to limit memory. Our technique requires neither a motion model nor knowledge of the training method. Averaged over six N3DV sequences, all six static codecs achieve gains on tracked sets (-42.0% to -71.8% BD-rate) over per-frame coding. On untracked sets, all codecs except HGSC, which appears incompatible with our technique, remain competitive with per-frame coding (-3.5% to +5.0%). We further replace D-FCGS's I-frame coding with our technique while retaining its P-frame coding, yielding an overall BD-rate of -46.2%. We propose to visualize "trackedness" using an inter-frame similarity metric. The project is available at https://wcjj1236.github.io/d3dgs-benchmark.
Ziyou Jiang Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mingyang Li Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences, Junjie Wang Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yuekai Huang, Jie Huang, Zhiyuan Chang, Zhaoyang Li, Qing Wang
Harmful memes are ever-shifting in the Internet communities, which are difficult to analyze due to their type-shifting and temporal-evolving nature. Although these memes are shifting, we find that different memes may share invariant principles, i.e., the underlying design concept of malicious users, which can help us analyze why these memes are harmful. In this paper, we propose RepMD, an ever-shifting harmful meme detection method based on the design concept reproduction. We first refer to the attack tree to define the Design Concept Graph (DCG), which describes steps that people may take to design a harmful meme. Then, we derive the DCG from historical memes with design step reproduction and graph pruning. Finally, we use DCG to guide the Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) to detect harmful memes. The evaluation results show that RepMD achieves the highest accuracy with 81.1% and has slight accuracy decreases when generalized to type-shifting and temporal-evolving memes. Human evaluation shows that RepMD can improve the efficiency of human discovery on harmful memes, with 15\sim30 seconds per meme.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Jie Huang, Xin Liao, Junjie Wang Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mingyang Li Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenshuo Wang ISCAS, Ziyou Jiang Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shoubin Li, Qing Wang
With the rise of short-video platforms, hate speech has evolved from static text and memes into more covert and aggressive hateful video formats, profoundly impacting social dynamics and public sentiment. Existing detection methods typically rely on multimodal feature fusion, which blurs the distinct boundaries of modality-specific information. This leads to the feature dilution problem, where dominant benign modalities often overwhelm sparse, localized hateful cues. To address this, we propose SAGE (Synergistic Adaptive Gating of Experts), a novel framework that shifts the paradigm from blind feature mixing to decision-level arbitration. Mimicking human cognitive processes, SAGE instantiates disentangled experts to rigorously preserve modality-specific semantics, facilitates global expert deliberation for context-aware refinement, and convenes an instance-level tribunal to dynamically arbitrate the final verdict based on evidentiary salience. Extensive experiments on HateMM and MultiHateClip benchmarks demonstrate that SAGE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving accuracy gains of 6.37% to 21.23% and macro-F1 score gains of 6.77% to 28.01%.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表