跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2084新增论文
+1691其中 AI 相关
+145已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 06:59 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 10:31各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 10:32 — 2026-11-11 10:32(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 06:59最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 10:31库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

20,647 已收录论文17,533 AI 相关5,643 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 06:58(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.06840

相同布局,不同数量:文生图模型中的数字词在超过十之后起什么作用

Same Layout, Different Count: What Number Words Do Past Ten in Text-to-Image Models

Liang Yue, Eric A. Vance

AI 速读 基于摘要

研究五个开源文生图模型在请求超过约十个物体后,数字词对生成数量的影响及其与初始噪声的关系。

cs.CV · cs.LG

查看原文摘要

Ask SD3.5-Medium for twelve of an object and then, from the same starting noise, for twenty-five. The picture keeps its layout, but the count changes about as much as it would under a new random seed, and in no consistent direction. We study what number words do once a request passes about ten objects, in five open text-to-image models. Holding the object and the starting noise fixed, we change one thing at a time, and people who never see the request count 3,088 of the images. Every model follows the number for small crowds, but only up to a point, its reach: SD3.5-M and FLUX.1-dev stop following it soon after ten, while FLUX.2 [klein] and Qwen-Image follow it loosely up to twenty-five. Beyond SD3.5-M's reach, the coarse part of the starting noise fixes the composition of the picture but not how many objects it holds: redrawing only the noise finer than an eighth of the image keeps the layout as well as a new number does, and already moves the count two-thirds as far. The number word still reaches the denoiser and acts in its first steps, but nothing we tried gives it a clear direction. Shown instead as a noised grid in the starting latent, the count is drawn: people find it in 59% of images, against 4% when it is only told. Past ten, an exact-match score barely separates a model that follows the number loosely from one that ignores it, and a relative-error score can even prefer a constant guess of sixteen. A same-noise test with a few requests per object tells them apart.

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.06168

Reasoning-Aware Cross-Modal Association Unlearning in Multimodal Large Reasoning Models

Xinghao Li, Chenchen Tan, Youyang Qu, Shujie Cui, Xingliang Yuan, Cunjian Chen, Chi Liu, Longxiang Gao

原文摘要

Multimodal large reasoning models (MLRMs) integrate visual inputs with textual and parametric knowledge, allowing sensitive information to be accessed through cross-modal associations during reasoning. This raises privacy concerns when a visual input should no longer provide access to such information. Machine unlearning can remove this influence without retraining the model from scratch. However, multimodal unlearning methods mainly target samples, concepts, or knowledge content, without separating the knowledge from the cross-modal association through which it is accessed. In reasoning models, target information may disappear from the final answer while remaining in intermediate reasoning, or be replaced by incorrect substitute knowledge. We therefore study cross-modal association unlearning, where the forget target is a designated visual-to-knowledge association: the model should suppress target-bearing behavior under the designated visual context while preserving access to the same knowledge in permitted contexts. We propose Visual-Keyed Counterfactual Rebinding (VKCR), a parameter-efficient framework for cross-modal association editing. VKCR first localizes the edit to a compact association-conditioned parameter subspace. It then reduces support for the designated target at task outputs and counterfactually rebinds the affected reasoning behavior by discouraging target-bearing or unsupported continuations while favoring valid non-sensitive alternatives. We further introduce CLEAR-R and MLLMU-R to evaluate target leakage, hallucinated reassociation, reasoning preservation, and modality-specific utility. Experiments show that VKCR substantially reduces image-conditioned target leakage and hallucinated reassociation, including across heterogeneous task formulations, while preserving non-sensitive visual reasoning and permitted text-only knowledge.

cs.CV · cs.AI