跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 21:43 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 21:46 — 2026-11-09 21:46(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 21:43最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 21:40(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.09047

Grounding-Aware Judge Reward Reinforcement Learning for Out-of-Domain Face Anti-Spoofing

Xiaoyong Yu, Xinge Yu

原文摘要

Face Anti-Spoofing (FAS) must distinguish genuine faces from presentation attacks. A unified Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) is an attractive solution: it detects physical attacks (print, replay, mask) in one model and produces interpretable forensic evidence via Chain-of-Thought (CoT). A central obstacle to post-training such a model with reinforcement learning is that FAS reasoning has no rule-verifiable ground truth: only the binary verdict is checkable, while the reasoning chain cannot be verified by any hand-crafted rule. Optimizing the verdict alone is therefore a sparse, hackable signal. The model can reach the correct answer through a shortcut such as a false-rejection bias, which does not generalize. We address this with a grounding-aware judge reward. A 32B vision-language judge scores each reasoning chain against the image on evidence anchoring, logical coherence, and domain knowledge, turning the image itself into the verification signal. The reward is applied in a Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) stage after CoT supervised fine-tuning. It is the judge, rather than the RL objective, that supplies the process supervision a verdict-only reward cannot. Our study starts from a model that already performs well In-Domain (ID) after CoT-based supervised fine-tuning and asks how to improve its Out-of-Domain (OOD) generalization. We find that grounding-aware rewards are an effective means to that end. We validate the method on OOD generalization, where the reward reduces ACER on two physical benchmarks (LCC-FASD 0.288 to 0.273, MSU-MFSD 0.431 to 0.409) while preserving ID accuracy (CelebA-Spoof 0.033 to 0.035). Against ResNet-50/101 and CLIP-ViT-B/16 baselines, the MLLM dominates ID and matches or surpasses the strongest baseline OOD. To our knowledge this is the first use of LLM-as-judge process supervision for FAS.

cs.CV