跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 03:01 — 2026-11-16 03:01(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.09047

Grounding-Aware Judge Reward Reinforcement Learning for Out-of-Domain Face Anti-Spoofing

Xiaoyong Yu, Xinge Yu

原文摘要

Face Anti-Spoofing (FAS) must distinguish genuine faces from presentation attacks. A unified Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) is an attractive solution: it detects physical attacks (print, replay, mask) in one model and produces interpretable forensic evidence via Chain-of-Thought (CoT). A central obstacle to post-training such a model with reinforcement learning is that FAS reasoning has no rule-verifiable ground truth: only the binary verdict is checkable, while the reasoning chain cannot be verified by any hand-crafted rule. Optimizing the verdict alone is therefore a sparse, hackable signal. The model can reach the correct answer through a shortcut such as a false-rejection bias, which does not generalize. We address this with a grounding-aware judge reward. A 32B vision-language judge scores each reasoning chain against the image on evidence anchoring, logical coherence, and domain knowledge, turning the image itself into the verification signal. The reward is applied in a Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) stage after CoT supervised fine-tuning. It is the judge, rather than the RL objective, that supplies the process supervision a verdict-only reward cannot. Our study starts from a model that already performs well In-Domain (ID) after CoT-based supervised fine-tuning and asks how to improve its Out-of-Domain (OOD) generalization. We find that grounding-aware rewards are an effective means to that end. We validate the method on OOD generalization, where the reward reduces ACER on two physical benchmarks (LCC-FASD 0.288 to 0.273, MSU-MFSD 0.431 to 0.409) while preserving ID accuracy (CelebA-Spoof 0.033 to 0.035). Against ResNet-50/101 and CLIP-ViT-B/16 baselines, the MLLM dominates ID and matches or surpasses the strongest baseline OOD. To our knowledge this is the first use of LLM-as-judge process supervision for FAS.

cs.CV

新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38185

Complementing Text Based Moderation with Multimodal Grounding: Detecting Fraudulent Inducement Behaviors on Short Video Platforms

Xiaoyong Yu

原文摘要

Short video platforms have become a primary channel for black and gray industry operations in internet finance, where inducements such as prompts to like, follow, join private chat groups, or click external links frequently steer users toward fraud. Because such videos are short, dynamic, and often convey intent through fleeting visual cues rather than stable text, a moderation system must guarantee detection recall and localize the offending segment so reviewers inspect only the relevant clip. Existing OCR+LLM pipelines transcribe on-screen text frame by frame and classify the transcript, but exploit only textual information. Many inducements are conveyed through visual cues OCR cannot observe, and keyframe-based localization cannot recover precise temporal boundaries. We explore OCR+MLLM, which augments the text pipeline with a Multimodal Large Language Model, and compare three routes: OCR+LLM, OCR+MLLM, and a large zero-shot MLLM, along detection, latency, token consumption, and deployment complexity. OCR preserves the text signal that guarantees recall, while the MLLM jointly performs OCR-grounded discrimination and temporal grounding, localizing both textual and non-textual inducements. We construct a dataset of 2,419 internet finance short videos (66.49 hours) with 3,194 annotated events across four categories, and study reward design for RL-based grounding under class imbalance. We report two findings: auxiliary reward terms are exploited through reward hacking, and stronger localization rewards degrade class-balanced detection. We therefore design a recall-weighted F2 localization reward with class-balanced resampling. Experiments show OCR+MLLM localizes better than the keyframe OCR+LLM baseline (mIoU 26.52 vs. 14.49) and detects non-textual inducements that text-only pipelines miss, while maintaining 67.0 percent macro recall.

cs.CV

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.163ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

A Comprehensive Survey of Process Reward Models: Data Generation, Model Construction, and Usage

Congmin Zheng, Jiachen Zhu, Zhuoying Ou, Yuxiang Chen, Kangning Zhang, Rong Shan Shanghai Jiaotong University, Zeyu Zheng Carnegie Mellon University, Mengyue Yang University of Bristol 等 11 位作者

原文摘要

Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced reasoning ability, yet conventional alignment remains dominated by outcome reward models (ORMs) that judge only final answers. Process Reward Models(PRMs) address this gap by evaluating and guiding reasoning at the step or trajectory level. This survey provides a systematic overview of PRMs through the full loop: how to generate process data, build PRMs, and use PRMs for test-time scaling and reinforcement learning. We summarize applications across math, code, text, multimodal reasoning, robotics, and agents, and review emerging benchmarks. Our goal is to clarify design spaces, reveal open challenges, and guide future research toward fine-grained, robust reasoning alignment.

cs.CL · cs.CV

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表