Vision-language models (VLMs) applied to 3D medical scans face a structural memory wall. A single CT or MRI volume produces tens of thousands of vision tokens, and the resulting key-value (KV) cache scales linearly with both batch and context. Existing KV compression methods operate on the cache's feature or token statistics, or apply 1D and 2D transforms, leaving the three-axis spatial structure in the cache unexploited. We propose TACT-KV (Tri-Axis Cosine Transform), a calibration-free KV compression method that exploits strong spatial correlations in visual KV states along all three anatomical axes of 3D scans. This correlation concentrates the KV cache energy under a frequency-domain transform. TACT-KV applies a separable 3D discrete cosine transform to the KV cache, allocates a per-layer bit budget across frequency bins via reverse water-filling (more bits to high-energy components), and quantizes each bin with a fixed scalar codebook. We derive a close-form relation: the distortion reduction from adaptive bit allocation is dominated by the spectral concentration of the transformed cache. Across six medical VLMs and two 3D CT benchmarks, TACT-KV achieves the lowest 1-bit prediction-flip rate on eleven of twelve model and dataset pairs in our main comparison. The same advantage reproduces on four general-purpose VLMs evaluated on video tasks, indicating that the benefit of exploiting three-axis structure generalizes beyond medical imaging. At equal high-bandwidth memory (HBM), TACT-KV scales the decoding batch size on a single GPU by up to $8\times$.
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) typically improves pass@1 but can fall behind its base model at large sampling budgets $k$, commonly interpreted as sharpening existing solutions. Because adjacent pass@$k$ estimates reuse generations, pointwise error bars cannot establish a crossover. We formulate paired inference on the RL-minus-base difference curve: a prompt-level multiplier bootstrap yields a one-sided dominance test and simultaneous confidence bands requiring both an early gain and a later loss. Among nine public RLVR checkpoints at 3k-16k token limits, only one narrowly meets this criterion before multiplicity adjustment; asymmetric truncation can create, mask, or reverse crossovers. On 1,060 deduplicated competition problems at 32k tokens, two 1.5B models exhibit certified crossovers around $k\approx10$-$60$, while two 7B models show no supported loss. A paired variance decomposition shows why adding prompts improves power more than deeper sampling. Prompts with identical base success probability diverge after RLVR, with dispersion replicating across independent generation halves and violating Lipschitz slope bounds for reasonable deterministic maps. Modeling RLVR as a Markov kernel, Jensen's inequality shows that conditional dispersion depresses pass@$k$ for $k\ge2$. Once dispersion is modeled, the conditional-mean log-odds slope is below one in every pair: RLVR improves hard prompts on average, while late-$k$ loss comes from a 2%-3% minority of base-solved prompts collapsing onto a repeated modal wrong answer and resisting prefix rescue up to 4,096 tokens. In controlled runs from one base model on 3,000 new problems, all four GRPO arms fall behind near $k\approx200$ and remain behind through $k=4096$, while SFT stays significantly ahead throughout.
Motivated by the observational incompleteness of intermediate-to-long-period Earth-size planets, we present TransitNet, a compact attention-augmented deep-learning framework for low-SNR transit blind searches. To enable realistic method development and objective threshold calibration under blind-search conditions, we develop a unified dataset construction, benchmarking, and threshold-selection framework. On recovery benchmarks constructed from unseen Kepler targets, TransitNet attains 95.2 percent accuracy in the challenging SNR range of 6 to 8 and outperforms both TLS and BLS, achieving ROC-AUC and PR-AP values of 0.974 and 0.982, respectively. In an injected Earth-size and sub-Earth-size transit recovery experiment, TransitNet achieves a recovery rate of 93.0 percent, substantially exceeding those of TLS (63.1 percent) and BLS (60.0 percent). In addition to detection, TransitNet provides attention-based estimates of transit windows and midpoints. On an independent evaluation set, 97.4 percent of injected transits are fully covered by the estimated transit window. Applied to real Kepler observations, the model successfully recovers all 34 selected confirmed Kepler planets, with a mean absolute transit midpoint error of 1.24 hours. The model combines a compact footprint of about 1.5 MB with high inference efficiency, yielding speed-ups of about 12 to 25 times relative to CPU-TLS and about 4 to 5 times relative to CPU-BLS. These results demonstrate that TransitNet provides an accurate, scalable, and computationally efficient framework for low-SNR transit blind searches in the tested regime and motivate its extension to longer-period Earth-size planet searches.
Computer-use agents (CUAs) are commonly evaluated against fixed task specifications, but users may omit requirements, add constraints, or require approval before consequential actions. Completing the benchmark instruction does not guarantee serving the person who asked. We introduce PersonaCUABench, which holds 74 tasks across 11 domains fixed and varies only who asks. A persona agent, playing one of 44 personas in four groups, rewrites each instruction in that user's own words and answers the CUA's questions, while the CUA sees only the dialogue, never the profile or the original instruction. Across nine backbones (3,330 runs), mean task completion falls by 36% relative to the original requests. The losses have two sources: in 59.9% of cells that lose points, the agent engages with what the user asked for and still gets it wrong, and 11.2% are stops the user requested that the checker scores as failures. Even when a persona request is fully completed, the user gives the top satisfaction rating in only 62.7% of cells, against 84.1% for the original requests. CUAs should therefore be evaluated not only on task completion but also on whether they meet the requirements and constraints users express. Code: https://github.com/MatrAIx-ai/PersonaCUABench. Project page: https://matraix.ai/research/persona-cua.html