跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 03:55 — 2026-11-16 03:55(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2611.05726

Do Language Models Know Which Constraints Belong Together?

Junbo Jacob Lian, Kaixuan Chen, Hanzhang Qin, Huiling Chen, Chaoyu Zhang, Chung-Piaw Teo

原文摘要

Dantzig--Wolfe reformulation strengthens the linear relaxation of a mixed-integer program by convexifying constraint families, and each candidate costs a column generation run. The choice is hard when families strengthen the bound only together, as in classical lot-sizing, network-design, and facility-location formulations. We prove that when an evaluation convexifies at most $s$ of $k$ families, methods that observe only bounds need of order $k^w$ evaluations to find a hidden group of $w$ families in the worst case. A prediction missing $e$ members reduces this to $Θ(k^e)$ through a staged search that need not know $e$. The orders extend to several groups, prices, and growing evaluation costs. We study two predictors: a lookahead at an optimal LP dual, which vanishes on groups whose families share no variable, and language models reading the model, verified by the staged search in JointDW. Such groups appear in three of ten MIPLIB-NL models whose bound can be improved and in all 59 benchmark instances. Given the coefficients of models with up to 16 families, one language model names a true group first in 249 of 252 answers. On the benchmark instances, decompositions chosen by language models from the text solve faster than those of GCG's detector.

cs.LG · cs.AI · cs.DS · math.OC