Zhengcheng Wang, Zichuan Lin, Yijun Yang, Haobo Fu, Deheng Ye
Existing Vision-Language Navigation (VLN) agents based on Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) often suffer from errors of perception, reasoning, and planning, which significantly hinder their navigation performance. To address these limitations, a novel VLN agent framework, named SeeNav-Agent, is proposed. First, to reduce hallucinations of the visual module of the VLN agent, a dual-view Visual Prompt (VP) technique is introduced, which can also improve the agent's understanding of current spatial states. Subsequently, a novel step-level Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) method, Step Reward Group Policy Optimization (SRGPO), is designed for post-training. In SRGPO, we first define verifiable process rewards for navigation, and then perform efficient step-level advantage estimation by randomly grouping navigation steps. SRGPO provides dense reward signals for the RFT of the VLN agent and enhances its planning capability. Experiments on both the EmbodiedBench Navigation (Embench-Nav) and VLN-CE validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. By introducing the zero-shot VP module, the GPT-4.1 achieves a navigation success rate of 86.7%, surpassing the current best LVLM by approximately 20 percentage points (pp) on Embench-Nav and achieves an 11.1 pp improvement on VLN-CE compared to the base model. With VP+SRGPO, the Qwen2.5-VL-3B model reaches a navigation success rate of 72.3%, outperforming the best existing LVLM model by 5.6 pp on Embench-Nav and achieves 8.9 pp improvement on VLN-CE compared to the baseline method. Moreover, compared to GRPO and GiGPO, the proposed SRGPO demonstrates significant improvements in training stability, convergence efficiency, and generalization capability.
We consider $T$ repeated second-price auctions across $n$ pacing bidders with i.i.d. item arrivals, and show that it is computationally impossible for all bidders to achieve no-regret simultaneously while satisfying their respective budget or return-on-investment constraints. Therefore, in the prominent internet auction systems where buyers simultaneously deploy pacing algorithms or automated bidding agents, we cannot hope to achieve joint no-regret guarantees in general. We establish a deterministic relationship that high variance in online bidding systems implies high regret. By showing that one can extract a pacing equilibrium from a low-variance system, we prove PPAD-hardness of attaining joint no-regret. For several widely used bidding algorithms, we also show evidence from dynamical systems and numerical simulations that they can indeed display high-variance behavior through cycling, even on simple market instances.
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has delivered impressive gains in mathematical and multimodal reasoning and has become a standard post-training paradigm for contemporary language and vision-language models. However, the RLVR recipe introduces a significant risk of capability regression, in which models forget foundational skills after prolonged training without employing regularization strategies. We empirically confirm this concern, observing that open-source reasoning models suffer performance degradation on core capabilities such as perception and faithfulness. While imposing regularization terms like KL divergence can help prevent deviation from the base model, these terms are computed on the current task and therefore do not guarantee preservation of broader knowledge. Meanwhile, commonly used experience replay across heterogeneous domains makes it nontrivial to decide how much training emphasis each objective should receive. To address this, we propose RECAP-a replay strategy with dynamic objective reweighting for general knowledge preservation. Our reweighting mechanism adapts online using short-horizon signals of convergence and instability, shifting the post-training focus away from saturated objectives and toward underperforming or volatile ones. Our method is end-to-end and readily applicable to existing RLVR pipelines without training additional models or heavy tuning. Extensive experiments on benchmarks using Qwen2.5-VL-3B and Qwen2.5-VL-7B demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, which not only preserves general capabilities but also improves reasoning by enabling more flexible trade-offs among in-task rewards.