跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+6109新增论文
+5222其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 07:04 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 06:17各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 07:37 — 2026-11-05 07:37(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 07:04最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 06:17库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

14,786 已收录论文12,897 AI 相关3,089 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 07:02(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38793

Trustworthy Distributed Machine Learning in Cloud-Edge-IoT Systems: A Heterogeneity-Aware Survey of Security, Privacy, and Robustness

Long Dang, Ali Alfatemi, Kaiqi Xiong, Mohammed Aledhari, Abdellah Chehri, Shawqi Al-Maliki, Mohamed Rahouti

Distributed machine learning (DML), including conventional distributed training and federated learning (FL), enables collaborative model development across cloud-edge-IoT systems without fully centralizing raw data. However, distributing data, computation, updates, and orchestration increases the attack surface and introduces coupled challenges across privacy, robustness, reliability, fairness, and governance. This survey presents a security-centered, heterogeneity-aware roadmap for trustworthy DML, with FL treated as a prominent high-risk case. We first characterize the assets, adversaries, trust assumptions, and coordination patterns that define DML/FL security boundaries. We then analyze how statistical, system, and trust heterogeneity, including non-IID data, resource asymmetry, intermittent participation, and cross-silo/cross-device trust differences, affect convergence, fairness, attack detectability, and defense reliability. Next, we synthesize attack-defense interactions across poisoning, backdoors, Byzantine manipulation, privacy leakage, model extraction, network/orchestration attacks, Sybil behavior, and strategic participation. We further compare layered defenses, including robust aggregation, drift-aware optimization, differential privacy, secure aggregation, homomorphic encryption, secure multiparty computation, trusted execution environments, watermarking, provenance, authenticated communication, and monitoring. Finally, we discuss deployment, evaluation, governance, and open research guidelines, emphasizing reproducible, non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) partitions, attack-aware benchmarks, privacy budgets, attack success rate, client-level disparity, latency, communication, memory, energy/carbon overhead, and auditable lifecycle artifacts.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CR · cs.DC · cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38173

A Gradient based Adversarial Augmentation Framework for Mitigating Unlearnable Datasets

Long Dang, Satpal Sura, Kaiqi Xiong

Unlearnable data methods (ULD) protect public data from unauthorized model training by adding imperceptible perturbations that create a learning shortcut. A deep neural network can exploit the shortcut learning path to minimize training loss without learning generalizable features. Intuitively, finding adversarial versions of perturbed images that can substantially increase the model's loss can force the model to learn generalizable features. Existing data augmentation based attacks rely on heuristic search strategies/random sampling over a curated augmentation set to identify adversarial augmentation operations, an approach that often does not scale when the number of candidate operations is large. To address the challenge of a large search space, we propose {\techname}, a gradient based adversarial augmentation framework that learns an augmentation policy via stochastic gradient ascent. {\techname} leverages a differentiable data augmentation pipeline to efficiently search a set of up to 18 augmentation techniques, from which a grid search selects a protection-specific subset. The augmentation subset is trained to maximize a surrogate model's classification loss. We introduce a perceptual-plus-pixel regularization to learn operation parameters that preserve image semantics. Under a controlled ablation, {\techname} consistently outperforms an equivalent random sampling baseline (80.0\% vs. 77.29\% clean test accuracy on EMIN-protected CIFAR-10 for ResNet-18 and 83.28\% vs. 66.45\% on NTGA-protected CIFAR-10 for MobileNet-V2), demonstrating that gradient guidance drives the clean test accuracy recoverability rather than the expanded search space. {\techname} offers an effective and scalable adversarial augmentation framework for stress-testing ULD methods, a critical tool for developing robust ULD methods.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗