跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+6109新增论文
+5222其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 06:01 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 06:17各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 06:57 — 2026-11-05 06:57(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 06:01最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 06:17库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

14,786 已收录论文12,897 AI 相关3,089 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 05:58(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.40447

从谱系上下文学习发育动力学

Learning developmental dynamics from lineage context

Gokul Gowri, Nic Fishman, William N. Colgan, Minming Wang, Yusuke Kijima, Sachin A. Kumar, Aleksandr Zimin, Luke W. Koblan 等 13 位作者

AI 速览:作者提出“谱系修补”(lineage inpainting)生成建模方法,利用树结构Transformer与随机插值从谱系上下文预测细胞状态动态。

A central goal of biology is to predict the dynamics of multicellular systems. Lineage context (the states of a cell's sisters, cousins, etc.) could inform these predictions, but how best to leverage it remains unclear. Here we introduce lineage inpainting, a generative modeling approach that uses lineage context with tree-structured transformers and stochastic interpolants to model cell state dynamics across lineage trees. Applied to a lineage-traced transcriptional atlas of mouse embryogenesis, it recovers dynamics not resolved by gene expression alone, including multiple transcriptional convergence events where distinct lineages are drawn to a common state. Despite being fit on unperturbed development, lineage inpainting can generate hypotheses about perturbation responses by simulating counterfactuals. These simulations agree in many cases with observed developmental phenotypes, including a single-cell measurement of the Tbx5 knockout response. Our results show that lineage information provides a rich source of context for learning multicellular dynamics.

q-bio.QM · cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38709

Latent Decision Flow Rewards for Clinical Guideline Reasoning

Gaurav Bhatt, Marinka Zitnik

Clinical practice guidelines encode evidence-based recommendations as conditional decision flows, which makes them a natural source of process supervision for training reasoning models. Two properties of clinical reasoning make this supervision difficult to use. A decision flow consistent with a guideline does not by itself determine the correct answer for a given patient, which we call the path--answer gap, and several valid decision flows can support the same clinical decision, which we call path multiplicity. Current training approaches address parts of this problem. Answer rewards supervise the final decision, and process rewards computed against a reference flow supervise one valid decision flow per case. Supervised fine-tuning on annotated flows teaches guideline-consistent reasoning but constrains the model to one trajectory per case and can reduce answer accuracy. We introduce GUIDER, a method that jointly optimizes a decision flow controller and a reasoning policy. The controller learns to generate plausible decision flows from guideline-derived supervision, and the policy learns to generate a decision flow and a final answer for each patient case. GUIDER computes the process reward for the policy over several controller-generated flows, which accounts for path multiplicity, and gates this reward on answer correctness, which addresses the path--answer gap. Joint training allows the process supervision to evolve with the policy. On MedGUIDE, GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence, 3.3 and 3.1 points above the strongest clinical reinforcement learning baseline. With Qwen3-14B and Gemma4-12B backbones, GUIDER also improves over CRPO, MRPO, and FaithMed on the out-of-domain benchmarks AMEGA-LLM, RealMedQA, and CancerGUIDE.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG · cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2602.10156

STRAND: Sequence-Conditioned Transport for Single-Cell Perturbations

Boyang Fu, Sameer Gabbita, George Dasoulas, Xiang Lin, Shanghua Gao, Xiaorui Su, Soumya Ghosh, Marinka Zitnik

Prediction of the transcriptional response of a cell to a genetic perturbation is a central problem in the computational modeling of gene regulation. Perturbations of the same gene can produce different transcriptional responses depending on the targeted locus, such as an alternative transcription start site or a distal regulatory element, and gene-level perturbation models represent these distinct interventions with a single gene identifier. We introduce STRAND, a generative model that encodes the regulatory DNA sequence at the perturbation locus and uses this encoding to parameterize a conditional transport process from control to perturbed single-cell states. Sequence conditioning enables zero-shot prediction for perturbation targets absent from training and supports locus-resolved inputs at 128 bp model resolution within a 524 kb sequence window. On CRISPRi screens in K562, Jurkat, and RPE1 cells, STRAND achieves the best average rank on few-shot and unseen-gene benchmarks, with gains of up to 33% in perturbation discrimination, and improves transfer to held-out cell lines by up to 0.12 in $Δ$Pearson. Ablation studies attribute these gains to sequence conditioning and to conditional transport. At the locus level, STRAND distinguishes alternative transcription start sites and validated regulatory elements that gene-identifier models represent as a single perturbation. STRAND is available at https://github.com/mims-harvard/STRAND.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

q-bio.GN · cs.LG · q-bio.CB
arXiv ↗PDF ↗