跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 21:04 — 2026-11-04 21:04(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 4 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
版本更新 · v8arXiv:2402.11887

Generative Semi-supervised Graph Anomaly Detection

Hezhe Qiao, Qingsong Wen, Xiaoli Li, Ee-Peng Lim, Guansong Pang

This work considers a practical semi-supervised graph anomaly detection (GAD) scenario, where part of the nodes in a graph are known to be normal, contrasting to the extensively explored unsupervised setting with a fully unlabeled graph. We reveal that having access to the normal nodes, even just a small percentage of normal nodes, helps enhance the detection performance of existing unsupervised GAD methods when they are adapted to the semi-supervised setting. However, their utilization of these normal nodes is limited. In this paper, we propose a novel Generative GAD approach (namely GGAD) for the semi-supervised scenario to better exploit the normal nodes. The key idea is to generate pseudo anomaly nodes, referred to as 'outlier nodes', for providing effective negative node samples in training a discriminative one-class classifier. The main challenge here lies in the lack of ground truth information about real anomaly nodes. To address this challenge, GGAD is designed to leverage two important priors about the anomaly nodes -- asymmetric local affinity and egocentric closeness -- to generate reliable outlier nodes that assimilate anomaly nodes in both graph structure and feature representations. Comprehensive experiments on six real-world GAD datasets are performed to establish a benchmark for semi-supervised GAD and show that GGAD substantially outperforms state-of-the-art unsupervised and semi-supervised GAD methods with varying numbers of training normal nodes. Code will be made available at https://github.com/mala-lab/GGAD.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2510.25934

Robust GNN Watermarking via Implicit Perception of Topological Invariants

Jipeng Li, Yanning Shen

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) represent valuable intellectual property, yet watermarks based on out-of-distribution triggers can weaken under pruning, fine-tuning, and distillation. We present InvGNN-WM, which links ownership verification to graph-invariant prediction. By supervising a shared GNN backbone to predict normalized algebraic connectivity on owner-private carrier graphs, InvGNN-WM enables calibrated multi-bit black-box verification through either an auxiliary scalar endpoint or a fixed owner-side decoder of ordinary task logits. We provide conditional guarantees for task-loss control, decision preservation, and key separation, and prove NP-completeness of the exact-removal decision problem for a restricted class of monotone separable decoders. Experiments on node- and graph-classification benchmarks demonstrate high watermark fidelity with small changes in task performance. The task-logit deployment achieves higher detection rates than PreGIP-adapted in matched comparisons and retains detection under the evaluated extraction and retraining budgets. Watermark-assisted distillation further enables owner-side recovery using private verification material.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG · cs.CR
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.36524

Causal Localization of Evidence Effects in Transformers

Jipeng Li, Pramod Khargonekar, Yanning Shen

Can controlled symbolic inputs reveal attention heads that influence a language model's decisions from natural language evidence? We introduce controlled evidence aggregation (CEA), which varies the counts and order of two symbols in otherwise fixed prompts and measures changes in a frozen Transformer's preference between two answer tokens. The preference is measured by their logit difference; the prompts prescribe no correct answer. Balanced utility causal selection (BUC) identifies compact head sets by jointly evaluating how much ablating their outputs removes the count effect and how closely patching mean outputs between count conditions recovers the effect in both directions. We derive conditional bounds linking head attribution to intervention effects and specifying when the attribution shortlist can be recovered from finite samples. In Pythia-410M, ablating sets of 1-12 heads selected separately for four ordering regimes removes 65.5-91.6% of the count effect. The sets retain their influence on count comparisons not used for selection. To test relevance beyond symbolic inputs, we evaluate a natural language task asking which state is supported by more reports. Ablating eight heads selected only on symbolic yes/no prompts lowers mean accuracy by 8.2 percentage points, versus 0.8 for random sets matched by size and layer. Our results demonstrate that controlled symbolic probes can identify compact attention head sets whose causal influence extends to natural language decisions.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL · cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.32046HF 社区推荐

Can Test-Time Memory Evolution Outperform Test-Time Training for Scientific Discovery?

Yepeng Liu, Shengmai Chen, Xuandong Zhao, Chengzhi Liu, Dawn Song, Xin Eric Wang, Yuheng Bu

Recent \emph{test-time training} (TTT) frameworks have enabled open-weight large language models (LLMs) to outperform inference-only frameworks powered by frontier models on scientific discovery tasks. However, TTT introduces additional computational cost for online weight updates during the discovery process, making computational efficiency an important consideration when scaling to larger models. This motivates us to explore an efficient \emph{test-time adaptation} method for scientific discovery. We introduce \emph{Test-Time Memory Evolution} (TTME), a plug-and-play test-time adaptation method, as an alternative to TTT. TTME continually updates the external memory by distilling the experience to guide subsequent discovery without updating model weights. To have a clean comparison, we evaluate TTME and TTT under the same discovery framework, replacing only the test-time adaptation method. Our evaluation shows that TTME outperforms TTT on all five mathematical tasks, while reducing computational cost by $82.8$-$84.6\%$ in FLOPs and $47.7$-$58.4\%$ in runtime. These results establish TTME as an effective and computationally efficient alternative to TTT in the evaluated discovery settings.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AI · cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗