Qin-Wen Luo, Sheng Ren, Xiang Chen, Rui Liu, Jun Fang, Naiqiang Tan, Jun Wang, Hua Chai 等 9 位作者
Deep search agents extend language models by interleaving reasoning with external retrieval. However, effective search-agent training requires addressing two challenges beyond final-answer optimization. First, the capability frontier of agents is largely determined by training questions, whereas fixed or labeled task collections cannot adapt as agents improve. Second, outcome-only reinforcement learning treats all successful trajectories equally, even when some correct answers rely on redundant searches, creating an inherent tension between answer accuracy and tool efficiency. To address these issues, we introduce \textsc{ZEST-Search}, a zero-label and tool-efficient framework for search-agent training via heterogeneous co-evolution. Starting from unlabeled reference questions, \textsc{ZEST-Search} constructs validated search tasks online through an answer-first and evidence-path-guided generation process. A heterogeneous proposer adaptively constructs training tasks around the solver's evolving capability boundary, while the solver learns search-augmented reasoning through reinforcement learning. To jointly optimize task difficulty and search efficiency, \textsc{ZEST-Search} employs an intermediate-difficulty reward for the proposer and a task-local tool-aware reward for the solver, encouraging informative tasks and correct answers with fewer redundant searches. Experiments on seven general-domain and multi-hop question answering benchmarks demonstrate that \textsc{ZEST-Search} consistently improves search-agent performance while achieving higher tool efficiency without labeled search-training data or expert search trajectories. Further analyses show that heterogeneous generation, adaptive difficulty control, and tool-aware optimization enable more effective search-agent training.
Federated Learning (FL) must balance training efficiency and model accuracy across heterogeneous clients. Post-training quantization (PTQ) avoids the extra computation of quantization-aware training (QAT), but can incur greater accuracy loss. We propose FedHQ, a hybrid quantization framework that assigns PTQ or QAT according to clients' hardware and data characteristics. Hardware-based speed estimates and local data-distribution indicators guide coarse-grained global initialization, followed by fine-grained training-based adjustment of selected client strategies. Experiments on three image-classification datasets show that FedHQ achieves up to 2.47x training speedup over FedAQT and up to 11.15 percentage points higher accuracy than FedFQ.
Clean-image prediction ($x$-prediction) and noise prediction yield equivalent population-optimal denoisers, yet can perform very differently in finite diffusion networks. For noisy input $Y_t$ with noise standard deviation $σ_t$, a noise predictor $f_{\varepsilon,t}$ induces the clean-image estimate $\widehat X_1=Y_t-σ_t f_{\varepsilon,t}(Y_t)$. This reveals a noise-transmission burden: the predictor must preserve information needed to cancel the input corruption. Under Gaussian corruption of $d$-dimensional data, a linear input bottleneck of rank $r<d$ imposes a denoising-error floor $σ_t^2(d-r)$ even with unrestricted downstream computation, while the corresponding optimal risk for image prediction remains bounded. EDM attenuates this bottleneck contribution at high noise; exact preconditioning cancels it at every noise level. Without an input bottleneck, assuming exact affine recovery of the noisy patch from the model representation, we characterize how the covariance spectrum of corrections beyond linear denoising determines the width required above the patch dimension. ImageNet experiments with JiT show that measured denoising losses reflect the predicted bottleneck floor and its attenuation or cancellation through preconditioning. Further widening yields larger relative denoising gains at low noise, where corrections beyond linear denoising spread across more directions, consistent with our spectral characterization of the required model width. Together, these results provide a denoising-based account of practical generation-quality gaps across prediction targets, preconditioning choices, and model widths.