跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 00:52 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 00:53 — 2026-11-10 00:53(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 00:52最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 00:50(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2605.20824

Markovian Circuit Tracing: Ground-Truth Tests of Transformer State Abstractions

Abdullah X

原文摘要

Mechanistic interpretability needs tests that separate accessible information from a causally useful internal abstraction. We introduce Markovian Circuit Tracing (MCT), a controlled benchmark for testing whether transformer activations support a compact state abstraction with recoverable transition structure. We train small causal transformers on sequences from four-state hidden Markov models. The experiment fixes the latent transition law and varies emission observability. The canonical artifact contains 15 runs across five fixed seeds. Every model reaches validation loss within 0.02 nats per token of the exact Bayes predictor. Under easy observability, held-out mean rowwise Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence from the true transition matrix is 0.114. The easy shuffled control gives 0.379. Under medium observability, recovered transition KL is 0.221. The medium shuffled control gives 0.355. Recovery collapses to control performance under hard observability. Natural activation swaps and state forcing show the same decline in causal specificity. New transition-specific controls refine this result. Untrained activations yield similar transition recovery in the easy regime. In medium, trained activations improve over the untrained control by 0.049 KL on average. Probabilistic Markov-order tests show a clear first-order gain in easy. Medium shows a smaller gain. Hard shows no meaningful gain. A second latent transition law reproduces the same observability-dependent pattern. The belief-probe control fails to support learned specificity. The fixed sparse autoencoder fails to improve transition recovery. MCT therefore tests when a state-machine interpretation earns support and when the evidence rejects it.

cs.LG