跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 04:25 — 2026-11-16 04:25(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2611.12144

DisasterVLG: Vision-Language Grounding and Evidence-Based Reasoning for Disaster Scene Understanding

Ali Diba, Aisha Al-Mohannadi, Yin Yang, Muhammad Imran, Ferda Ofli

原文摘要

General-purpose vision-language models struggle with crisis imagery due to its inherent noise, ambiguity, and high variability across disaster events - yet timely, accurate scene understanding is critical for humanitarian response. To address this, we introduce DisasterVLG, a large-scale multi-task dataset containing 1.24 million disaster images from 142 countries paired with 33 million structured annotations spanning dense captioning with localization, incident assessment, relational scene descriptions, and crisis-grounded visual question answering (VQA) across diverse hazard types and scene contexts worldwide. Unlike prior disaster benchmarks that focus narrowly on classification, DisasterVLG unifies recognition, grounded reasoning, and uncertainty-aware interpretation. A distinguishing feature is its evidence-grounded annotation design: each VQA instance includes supporting evidence text that links visual observations to answers, alongside positive and negative question pairs, multiple answer formats, and difficulty labels. Visual grounding layer links caption phrases to image regions and relationship statements to subject-object boxes, with explicit labels for visual supports and clues. To support rigorous evaluation, we construct a human-verified test set of 38K images (1.15M annotations) spanning broad geographic regions and disaster types. Experiments with domain-adapted vision-language models demonstrate strong performance across disaster captioning, incident recognition, and grounded VQA, while also exposing the limitations of general-purpose models in crisis-specific reasoning. DisasterVLG establishes a scalable, reproducible benchmark for vision-language models that must reason reliably under real-world uncertainty. We will publicly release the dataset, trained models, and code.

cs.CV