跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 06:43 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 06:45 — 2026-11-15 06:45(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 06:43最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 06:42(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05907

Does Your Trial Simulator Know What the Drug Does? An Intervention-Blind Test of Interventional Validity on 7,207 Registered Trials

Alicem Koyun

原文摘要

Patient world models are increasingly proposed as simulators of clinical trials, and recent surveys rank their capabilities on a ladder from temporal prediction to counterfactual rollouts. Position on that ladder is currently assigned by reading papers rather than by measurement. We turn the counterfactual rung into a measured quantity. From 30,119 completed phase 2/3 trials with results posted to ClinicalTrials.gov we construct 9,996 audited within-trial contrasts from 7,207 trials, and we score a simulator on how much of its accuracy depends on knowing which intervention was tested. The instrument is an intervention-blind reference: the same model, trained on the same trials, with every intervention-identifying field withheld. Interventional skill is the error the full model removes relative to that reference. On a temporal split (878 test contrasts from 655 trials) a registry-trained gradient-boosting simulator removes a fifth of the error of a trivial baseline, but its interventional skill is -0.12 (95% CI -0.21 to -0.05): withholding the intervention makes it better, and no alternative featurisation, stratum, temporal cut or same-molecule retrieval yields an interval above zero. A frontier language model reading only the registered protocol has interventional skill 0.20 [0.08, 0.31]; smaller and open-weight models sit at the limit of detection. Perturbation tests show the large model uses the intervention as such: swapping the arms reverses the sign of its prediction in 86% of contrasts. The blind reference is itself not drug-blind (a language model recovers the withheld drug class 45% of the time from the blind prompt), so interventional skill is a conservative lower bound. A reliability layer shows that ranking by predicted error lowers it but that calibrated error control does not transfer under temporal shift. Benchmark, code, prompts and per-call model outputs are released.

stat.AP · cs.AI · cs.LG

新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.36517

PRISM: Pathology Reliability In Scarce-label Medicine. A Tile-level Benchmark of Pathology Foundation Models

Alicem Koyun

原文摘要

Pathology foundation models are typically benchmarked on classification performance at full label availability and on in-distribution test sets, while calibration, behavior at low label budgets, and robustness under cross-institutional shift are seldom evaluated jointly. We introduce PRISM, a tile-level benchmark that measures the reliability of pathology foundation models along four axes: model choice, label fraction, calibration, and out-of-distribution transfer. PRISM evaluates eight foundation models (CLIP, PLIP, CONCH, UNI, Virchow2, GigaPath, H-Optimus-0, Midnight) on six tile-level datasets at six label fractions (1% to 100%) with three seeds (864 linear probe runs), extended with a five-hospital Camelyon17 study of 20 directed transfer pairs. Four phenomena emerge. (i) Under full supervision, AUROC rank predicts post-temperature calibration rank consistently across datasets (Spearman rho = 0.52, I^2 = 0%), whereas at 1% labels the relationship becomes dataset-specific (rho = -0.24, I^2 = 67%). (ii) On harder datasets the linear probe collapses to a single predicted class below a dataset-specific label fraction. (iii) Whether additional source-domain labels help or harm target calibration tracks how well the probe transfers: below a transfer AUROC of roughly 0.85, more labels worsen target ECE in 86-88% of combinations. (iv) Temperature scaling fails to reduce ECE in 49 of 288 cells, miscalibration is predominantly under-confidence, and a source-fitted temperature is harmful under failing transfer. PRISM is released as a pip-installable package with reference results for all 288 cells. Code and data: https://github.com/alicemkyn/prism-benchmark

cs.LG · cs.CV

新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.37712

Moment-Guided Optimizers for Noisy Deep Learning: MGO-SC as a Simple Consistency Gate for Adam-Style Updates

Alicem Koyun

原文摘要

Adaptive optimizers are widely used in deep learning, yet their behavior can degrade under heavy stochasticity and label noise where the sign and magnitude of gradients can be unstable. We study MGO-SC (Moment-Guided Optimizer with Sign-Consistency), a lightweight modification of Adam-style methods that derives a coordinate-wise consistency gate from the magnitude of a sign exponential moving average (EMA): coordinates whose gradient sign is stable are trusted, while coordinates whose sign fluctuates are down-weighted. We show that the naive form of this gate, which can only shrink updates, loses effective step size and underperforms when the learning rate is matched to the baseline. We therefore introduce a mean-preserving variant that reallocates trust across coordinates without changing the net per-tensor step magnitude. On CIFAR-10 with ResNet-18, under a matched learning rate and decoupled weight decay, mean-preserving MGO-SC consistently improves over its AdamW baseline across clean, symmetric, and asymmetric label noise (e.g., +1.4 points at 40% symmetric noise; paired bootstrap 95% CI excluding zero; Wilcoxon p<0.01), while adding no second-order information or per-sample filtering. We report matched-seed effect sizes, nonparametric bootstrap confidence intervals, and paired significance tests, and we release code and raw logs.

cs.LG