跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+5677新增论文
+4790其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 02:52 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 03:53各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 03:54 — 2026-11-05 03:54(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 02:52最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 03:53库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

14,354 已收录论文12,465 AI 相关3,088 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 02:50(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.04689

Uncertainty-Aware Prototype Learning for Open-Set Test-Time Adaptation

Jinwu Hu, Langyu Bian, Jian Sun, Dongjin Yang, Chao Shuai, Yufeng Wang, Kai Zhou, Bin Xiao 等 11 位作者

Open-set test-time adaptation (TTA) aims to adapt source-trained models to unlabeled test streams where covariate-shifted in-distribution (csID) samples and covariate-shifted out-of-distribution (csOOD) samples may coexist. Existing TTA methods are typically designed under a closed-set assumption and therefore lack explicit mechanisms for reliably distinguishing csID from csOOD samples. Consequently, csOOD samples may be mistakenly included in confidence-enhancing adaptation, producing harmful gradients that degrade known-class performance. To address this, we propose Uncertainty-Aware Prototype Learning for Open-Set Test-Time Adaptation (UAPA), a plug-and-play method for reliable open-set adaptation. Specifically, we first introduce Uncertainty-Driven ID/OOD Separation, which combines a classifier-prototype score with a mini-batch-normalized evidence-derived uncertainty score to distinguish csID from csOOD samples. We then propose a Dynamic Prototype Refinement strategy that periodically refines class-specific target prototypes using buffered csID features to progressively follow the estimated class directions. Lastly, we introduce Contrastive Prototype Entropy Adaptation, which applies entropy minimization to csID samples and entropy maximization to csOOD samples, while prototype-level contrastive learning aligns csID features with their corresponding target prototypes and reduces the maximum similarity between csOOD features and known-class prototypes. Empirically, UAPA outperforms the strongest baselines on the CIFAR benchmarks and Tiny-ImageNet-C, improving average OSCR by 2.08 and 1.28 percentage points, respectively.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG · cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2510.04257

AgentTypo: Adaptive Typographic Prompt Injection Attacks against Black-box Multimodal Agents

Yanjie Li, Yiming Cao, Dong Wang, Bin Xiao

Multimodal agents built on large vision-language models are increasingly deployed in open-world settings but remain highly vulnerable to prompt injection. Typographic text-in-image attacks such as FigStep have been evaluated mainly on standalone vision-language models. For agents, user goals, webpage context, and action history make the effect of embedded instructions uncertain, and robustness to behavior-guided, adaptive visual injections remains insufficiently studied. We introduce AgentTypo, a black-box red-teaming framework that launches adaptive typographic prompt injection by embedding optimized text into webpage images. We formulate an attention-guided automatic typographic prompt-injection objective that favors the attacker's expected answer over the clean-page answer, together with task-conditioned visual attention from small question-answering models. A novel black-box optimization method searches text position, contrast, and color. To further strengthen the attack, we develop a multi-LLM system that iteratively refines injection prompts using evaluation feedback and retrieves successful past examples for strategy learning. Experiments on the VWA-Adv and Mind2Web benchmarks show that AgentTypo significantly outperforms state-of-the-art image-based prompt injection attacks. Across seven closed- and open-source model backends, AgentTypo-pro achieves 45%-83% ASR, outperforming the CLIP-based AgentAttack by 29-47% and previous typographic attacks by 25%-37% on VWA-Adv.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CR · cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗