跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2新增论文
+2其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 00:53 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 02:46 — 2026-11-13 02:46(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 00:53最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 00:50(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12044

Leveraging High-Activity Post-Therapeutic I-131 Scans for Deep Learning Reconstruction of Extremely Sparse Planar Images in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Boyang Pan, Hang Yang, Jianchen Pan, Cui Gan, Lanxi Zhang, Hongmin Li, Nan-Jie Gong

原文摘要

Background: Diagnostic I-131 whole-body planar imaging in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is count-limited by low administered activity, and quality worsens under rapid acquisition. Models trained on such data struggle because their targets lack photon statistics. Purpose: To test whether high-quality post-therapeutic (PT) I-131 scans can serve as superior training references for enhancing sparse diagnostic planar images, using transfer learning and input-image addition. Methods: In this single-center prospective study, 111 patients were enrolled in PT training (n = 19), diagnostic follow-up (FU) training (n = 58), and FU paired test (n = 34) cohorts. Five Restormer-based models were trained: FU_DLx2 on FU labels; PT_DLx2 transfer-learned on PT data; PT_DLx1+ and PT_DLx2+ with input-image addition; PT_DLx6 as a PT-only reference. Test-time processing used two-step denormalization and Poisson re-scaling to preserve noise statistics. Quality was assessed by PSNR, SSIM, and a blinded dual-reader evaluation of all 34 test-cohort patients. Results: PT_DLx2 achieved the highest PSNR (34.4 +/- 3.6 dB) and SSIM (0.81 +/- 0.07). PT_DLx1+ and PT_DLx2+ were comparable (33.8 and 33.3 dB; SSIM 0.80). FU_DLx2 ranked below the unprocessed fast scan (30.3 vs. 32.0 dB; 0.76 vs. 0.79). Subjectively, PT_DLx2+ scored highest in image quality (4.54 +/- 0.60) and diagnostic confidence (4.54 +/- 0.60), surpassing the reference standard (4.19 +/- 0.83 and 4.31 +/- 0.81; P = 0.005 and P = 0.008). FU_DLx2 and PT_DLx6 scored lowest. Conclusion: Count-rich PT scans provide effective training priors for reconstructing extremely sparse images. Input-image addition and cross-domain transfer learning from PT data outperformed direct training on count-limited diagnostic data, supporting 2x scan acceleration with quality matching or exceeding the unaccelerated standard scan for selected PT-derived configurations.

eess.IV · cs.CV · physics.med-ph