跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 18:02 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 19:01 — 2026-11-15 19:01(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 18:02最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 18:01(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2607.26232

Image Forgery Detection under Generative and Composited Background Replacement: A Benchmark with Processing-Matched Controls

Bugra Alperen Uluirmak, Rifat Kurban

原文摘要

Consumer tools can now keep the subject of a photograph and replace, relight or edit everything behind it. Such edits place genuine people and objects in scenes they were never in, yet involve processing--resampling, harmonization, diffusion autoencoders--that also occurs in benign workflows. We introduce BG-REAL, a benchmark of 25,624 images built from 2,485 Open Images photographs with a dominant subject and real donor scenes. Each recipient is edited by donor compositing, learned harmonization, generative background inpainting, foreground-conditioned relighting and local background edits, and is paired with authentic controls that share the processing but not the semantic edit; all images of a recipient share file format and JPEG quality. Three generators (including FLUX.1 Fill), scene categories and subject classes are held out. Seven detectors published between 2022 and 2026 reach zero-shot AUROCs of at most 0.745 and have no useful operating point: manipulation localisers mark the preserved subject instead of the replaced background, and a detector of AI-generated images flags most authentic images passed through a diffusion autoencoder. After fine-tuning, the strongest detectors reach an AUROC of about 0.95, while re-implemented background-forgery detectors remain below 0.80. Controls show that full-background replacements by the training generators are detected from the edit itself, whereas local edits and SDXL and FLUX edits remain hard, and that full-background localisation largely reduces to subject segmentation. A model-agnostic training objective that uses the controls improves detection on unseen subjects for one detector and on local edits for another without changing in-distribution accuracy. The data are released.

cs.CV