跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 05:55 — 2026-11-16 05:55(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15114

What Does Each Part of Speech Need? Contexts, Subspaces and Dimensions in Static Word Embeddings

Jintang Xue, Chengwei Wei, Yun-Cheng Wang, C. -C. Jay Kuo

原文摘要

Static word embeddings give a word one vector, ignoring its different functions as noun, verb or adjective. Training on part-of-speech-tagged text gives each function its own vector, at the cost of a larger table. Using nine controlled corpora, we ask which context words each part of speech needs, whether it needs its own subspace, and whether the number of dimensions a word keeps should follow its part of speech or its frequency. The tags raise verb similarity on SimVerb-3500 at every dimension from 50 to 300 but help nouns much less. Added to verb-only text, adverbs help verbs more than as many random words; adjectives help nouns only slightly. At a fixed dimension, per-part-of-speech PCA bases preserve verb and adjective similarity better than a global basis or frequency-band bases. Nouns need more dimensions than verbs only among frequent words. We therefore allocate dimensions by frequency with these bases: at a third of the original size, only rare words lose dimensions, SimVerb-3500 and SimLex-999 nouns match the uncompressed table, and verb-to-noun retrieval stays within 0.02. Part of speech decides what a word's vector should be; frequency decides how much of it to keep.

cs.CL · cs.LG

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2606.19828

3D-PLOT-LLM: Part-Level Object Tokens for 3D Large Language Models

Jintang Xue, Xinyu Wang, Yixing Wu, Jingwen Chen, C. -C. Jay Kuo

原文摘要

3D multimodal large language models (3D MLLMs) describe a 3D object as a whole but cannot address, name, or reason about its parts. Prior part-aware attempts add segmentation decoders, heavier 3D encoders, or bounding-box grammars at substantial parameter cost. We take a fundamentally different path: we reorganize the input token stream so that parts become directly addressable through the LLM's own vocabulary. Our model, 3D-PLOT-LLM, partitions the frozen point encoder's patches into K locally coherent regions and inserts, before each region's patch tokens, a learnable per-region marker and a reserved vocabulary token <part_k>; a Marker-Space Refinement (MSR) module then conditions each marker on its region's spatial statistics and adjacency neighbors. The model thus cites parts in its output and follows prompts that refer to parts by token, a capability absent from prior object-level 3D MLLMs. To probe this interface, we construct PartVerse-QA, a vocabulary-level part-QA benchmark adapted from PartVerse mesh annotations (77K training pairs and 588 held-out queries on disjoint object splits), on which 3D-PLOT-LLM reaches caption-to-slots Jaccard 0.459 and Exact-match 13.78%, with a slot-to-caption GPT-4o judge of 44.68. On the text-description track of the 3DCoMPaT-GrIn part-aware grounded description benchmark, 3D-PLOT-LLM outperforms PointLLM, Kestrel, PARIS3D, and SegPoint on every reported text metric, and ShapeLLM on 3 of 4, with up to +3.03 GPT-4o judge over PointLLM. On Objaverse whole-object captioning, adding PartVerse-QA at Stage 2 yields +0.65 SBERT and +1.85 GPT-4o over PointLLM, and tops PointLLM-PiSA on 4 of 5 traditional metrics despite its part-grounded objective. All with under 1M new trainable parameters on a frozen point encoder, an order of magnitude below prior part-aware 3D MLLMs, and no learned part detector, segmentation decoder, or bounding-box head.

cs.CV