跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 13:24 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 14:14 — 2026-11-09 14:14(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 13:24最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 13:22(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02297

FactorSpec: Serving Exact Relational Constraints as Speculative Drafts

Jianchang Su, Dawei Xiang, Wei Zhang

原文摘要

Speculative decoding speeds up LLM serving by drafting tokens that the target model verifies in one pass, and its gain grows with the drafts the target accepts. Structured outputs should be an ideal case, because much of a record follows from relations among its fields: an itinerary's days follow from its cities' stays and flights. Serving engines, however, draft such text by proposing it from the prompt or a learned head, and their grammar masks enforce only syntax, so the model must satisfy the relations, which it violates: on NATURAL PLAN's trip problems, Qwen3-8B writes a valid itinerary for 10%, and retries that name the violated relation raise this to 14%. We present FactorSpec, which serves exact relational constraints as speculative drafts. FactorSpec compiles a JSON Schema and its relations into a factor graph with an exact feasibility check, drafts every token the constraint determines as certain, verifies each request at a width chosen for it, and computes the masks in worker processes outside the scheduler while the GPU runs. In SGLang, its drafts yield up to 10.5 tokens per verify step, up to 1.9x those of the fastest n-gram drafter, and it decodes up to 1.43x faster than speculators tuned per load, at a grammar mask's cost; it also leads in vLLM. Because every record is also valid, it serves up to 13.9x the valid records per GPU-second of syntax-only baselines.

cs.LG · cs.AI

新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.37631

What Improves During Pretraining? Tracking Knowledge Acquisition with Point-in-Time Models

Chang Su, Bin Wu, Emine Yilmaz, Yao Lu

原文摘要

Language models pretrained on web corpora collected over multiple years learn both general and domain-specific knowledge. How these different kinds of knowledge are learned as pretraining progresses remains unclear. Recent point-in-time models trained on web snapshots from different years provide a way to probe how knowledge prevalence varies over time. Using these models, we propose a temporal variability score (TVS), defined as the coefficient of variation of an item's negative log-likelihood across models. A higher score suggests that the knowledge may be less consistently represented across years of web text. We evaluate six benchmarks covering diverse topics using six models from multiple open-source model families. We find that low- and high-TVS items are learned similarly early in training, but high-TVS items improve faster later on. At the end of the pretraining run, high-TVS items outperform low-TVS items in 34 of 36 model-benchmark settings, with an average advantage of 7.3 points of chance-normalized accuracy. This pattern is most robust on knowledge-intensive tasks, even when comparing items of similar difficulty. Our findings reveal differences in how knowledge is learned over the course of pretraining, with temporal variability providing a diagnostic of these learning dynamics beyond aggregate benchmark scores.

cs.AI