跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+3新增论文
+3其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 16:14 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 16:45 — 2026-11-12 16:45(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 16:14最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 16:12(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.13931

TAPCO-G: LLM-Guided Design-Adaptive Timing and Power Co-Optimization with Graph-Based Physical Priors

Wuqian Tang, Zixiao Wang, Che-Chien Lin, Fong-Hua Fu, Laura Angélica Shion-Korsak, Xinyun Zhang, Bei Yu, Chun-Yao Wang

原文摘要

Post-placement timing and power co-optimization is critical to meeting setup timing targets and reducing power within placement constraints. A cell replacement can improve timing along one path while increasing power or reducing slack on others. Conventional optimizers follow fixed rules for scheduling and accepting repairs, limiting their ability to address design-specific bottlenecks. A large language model (LLM) can propose changes to these rules, but on its own it cannot reliably estimate how a cell replacement affects endpoint slack and power. TAPCO-G combines LLM-guided optimizer adaptation with graph-based physical priors to evaluate candidate cell replacements. The outer loop tunes tool settings using physical-design feedback and revises executable repair policies when tuning stalls. The inner loop anchors delay estimates to static timing analysis snapshots, accounts for upstream driver-load changes, and propagates delay shifts to timing endpoints. It combines these estimates with coarse-to-fine power screening to prioritize candidates for physical trials. TAPCO-G produced placement-legal, logic-equivalent implementations and outscored CERBERUS on all eight ASAP7 benchmarks from the MLCAD 2026 Contest, with a mean quality score gain of 5.516 points, and scored 21.648 points higher than TAPCO on average. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed co-optimization framework.

cs.AR · cs.AI