跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1673新增论文
+1257其中 AI 相关
+198已有论文修订
+101新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-14 00:45 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 20:44各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-13 01:20 — 2026-11-14 01:20(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-14 00:45最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 20:44库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,727 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-14 00:42(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16442

DesignTaste: Benchmarking AI-Generator Visual Design Against Award-Wining Works

Zhou Chen, JiaXiang Li, DanYing Pan, Ye Li, TianRui Yang, EnBao Zhang, YaNan Xiao, LiXin Sun 等 17 位作者

原文摘要

Text-to-image benchmarks commonly assess text-image alignment or overall preference. Whether models can produce good designs when a brief leaves the appearance open remains less well understood. We introduce DesignTaste, a visual design benchmark that compares generated images with award-winning works. From these works and their publicly available context, we derive 403 design briefs: 100 poster tasks from 100 Beste Plakate 2025 and 303 tasks spanning 20 categories from ADC 2026. Six leading commercial text-to-image models each generate an image from the same brief. A single model judge scores each output and the corresponding award-winning work independently on five evaluation dimensions. On each dataset, only ArtArk achieves a higher mean overall score than the award-winning works. All six models score lower in Creative Originality on both datasets. These results show that producing finished, visually appealing images does not imply that a model can develop good design solutions.

cs.CV · cs.AI