跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+586新增论文
+453其中 AI 相关
+91已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 11:13 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 11:12各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 11:29 — 2026-11-13 11:29(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 11:13最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 11:12库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 22:55

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

22,261 已收录论文18,776 AI 相关6,286 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 11:11(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2606.11711

Capacity-Constrained Online Convex Optimization with Delayed Feedback

Alexander Ryabchenko, Idan Attias, Daniel M. Roy

原文摘要

Online learning with delayed feedback typically assumes that the learner can track all pending rounds until their feedback arrives. In practice, tracking resources are finite, and feedback from rounds that cannot be tracked is permanently lost. In this paper, we study delayed online convex optimization (OCO) under a hard capacity constraint, where at most $C$ pending rounds can be tracked at any time. To model delay information, we introduce a semi-clairvoyant model that refines the clairvoyant assumption from prior work: rather than requiring delays to be known at prediction time, the learner observes delay expirations online, consistent with the classical unconstrained delayed setting. Our approach proceeds via a reduction to a novel ``delayed and weighted'' OCO problem, using a scheduler that randomizes which rounds are tracked and importance-weights the resulting observations. For the base problem, we propose and analyze Delayed-Weighted FTRL and its bandit analogue, obtaining regret bounds that characterize how weights interact with delayed feedback in both settings. Combining these bounds with our schedulers yields regret guarantees for capacity-constrained OCO under convex and strongly convex losses, for both first-order and bandit feedback. For first-order feedback, capacity $C = Ω(\log T)$ suffices to recover the standard delayed OCO rates up to logarithmic factors. For bandit feedback, the standard delayed BCO rates are instead modulated by $(1 + σ_{\text{max}}/C)$ factors, where $σ_{\text{max}}$ is the maximum number of outstanding observations. This allows the regret bound to degrade gracefully when $C < σ_{\text{max}}$. We complement our analysis with numerical experiments.

cs.LG · stat.ML

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2602.02634

A Reduction from Delayed to Immediate Feedback for Online Convex Optimization with Improved Guarantees

Alexander Ryabchenko, Idan Attias, Daniel M. Roy

原文摘要

This paper develops a reduction-based framework for online learning with delayed feedback that recovers and improves upon existing results for first-order and bandit convex optimization. We introduce a continuous-time model that enables an observation-centric rather than prediction-centric analysis. Under this model, regret decomposes into a delay-independent learning term and a delay-induced drift term, yielding a delay-adaptive reduction that converts any online linear optimization algorithm into one that handles round-dependent delays. For bandit convex optimization, we significantly improve existing regret bounds, with delay-dependent terms matching optimal first-order rates. For first-order feedback, we recover optimal regret bounds via a simpler, unified analysis. Quantitatively, for bandit convex optimization we obtain $O(\sqrt{d_{\text{tot}}} + T^{\frac{3}{4}}\sqrt{k})$ regret, improving the delay-dependent term from $O(\min\{\sqrt{T d_{\text{max}}},(Td_{\text{tot}})^{\frac{1}{3}}\})$ in prior work to $O(\sqrt{d_{\text{tot}}})$. Here, $k$, $T$, $d_{\text{max}}$, and $d_{\text{tot}}$ denote the dimension, time horizon, maximum and total delay, respectively. Under strong convexity, we achieve $O(\min\{σ_{\text{max}} \ln T, \sqrt{d_{\text{tot}}}\} + (T^2\ln T)^{\frac{1}{3}} {k}^{\frac{2}{3}})$, improving the delay-dependent term from $O(d_{\text{max}} \ln T)$ to $O(\min\{σ_{\text{max}} \ln T, \sqrt{d_{\text{tot}}}\})$, where $σ_{\text{max}}$ denotes the maximum number of outstanding observations and may be considerably smaller than $d_{\text{max}}$.

cs.LG