跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 00:52 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 01:34 — 2026-11-10 01:34(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 00:52最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 00:50(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.08922

Glyph: An Interpretability Engine for AI-Driven Scientific Discovery in Clinical Data

Robbie Holland, Ashwin Kumar, Mateus A. Esmeraldo, David Le, Andrea Fisher, Jiazhen Pan, Louisa Fay, Magdalini Paschali 等 22 位作者

原文摘要

Automated scientific discovery has the potential to advance understanding of disease mechanisms and accelerate identification of early disease markers. Manual data annotation is infeasible at population scale, motivating methods that automatically extract pre-defined phenotypes in multimodal and unstructured clinical data. Such pre-defined feature sets determine and limit which associations these approaches can discover. This limitation extends to agentic AI systems that use these tools to query population-scale data. In contrast, foundation models (FMs) trained on large volumes of clinical data can perform tasks beyond their training objectives. This suggests their latent embeddings may represent novel or unexplored features that could yield insights into disease mechanisms, yet such latent features remain difficult to interpret. To address this challenge, we introduce Glyph, an automated multistage framework that extracts features from multimodal and unstructured clinical data using FMs and sparse autoencoders, interprets them as coded clinical concepts, and evaluates their value for clinical scientific discovery. We applied Glyph to abdominal CT volumes, CT radiology reports and laboratory measurements from 41,628 patients across different institutions. We identified 397 predictive concepts supported by 4,463 Bonferroni-significant associations. Moreover, a majority of discovered associations were automatically reproducible in held-out cohorts across different sites. Glyph concepts provided complementary associations to literature-derived markers, leading to gains in predictive power. We envision that interpretability can extend beyond a mechanistic understanding of neural networks to connecting implicitly learned features with clinical knowledge and establishing their significance for patient outcomes. We release Glyph at https://github.com/StanfordMIMI/Glyph.

cs.AI

版本更新 · v5arXiv:2604.03614

One-Shot Localisation of the Global Minimum of a Noisy One-Dimensional Function: A Controlled Comparison of an Iterative Neural Minimizer, Set Transformers and Classical Estimators

Qusay Muzaffar, David Levin, Michael Werman

原文摘要

We study passive global optimisation: from twenty noisy samples of an unknown one-dimensional function, with no further queries, estimate where its global minimum lies. We build a benchmark and a self-checking harness and use them for a controlled comparison. The Neural Function Minimizer (NFM), which we introduce, moves a position across the domain for fifteen steps and re-reads the samples from it at every step; a same-size Set Transformer answers in one pass. In a 2x2 design each has one output head or an added mixture head, with the same data and inputs and three seeds each. Within the training families the two are tied on location error, and the mixture loss lowers it by about 0.45 points of the domain in both. The NFM's answers have lower regret, by 2.90 and 3.12 points of the range with one and two heads (significant after correction, and again on a block of fresh cases), mainly because its right-basin answers lie closer to the floor; a Set Transformer looped to the NFM's computation does not reproduce this within the training families, though it has the lower error on unseen functions (exploratory). The NFM also differs from the Set Transformers in encoder, local read, activation, losses and training time. At near-tied minima the form of the answer decides: point answers hedge in about a quarter of exact ties, mixture modes almost never, mixture means in more than 80%. Gaussian-process estimators, with no training, have the lowest regret and are the most accurate on unseen functions. We will release the benchmark, the models and the harness.

cs.LG · cs.AI