跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2新增论文
+2其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 23:49 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 00:37 — 2026-11-13 00:37(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 23:49最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 23:44(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11727

State Media at Retrieval Time: A Large-Scale Audit of Russian State-Aligned Sources in AI Chatbot Responses

Laura Kurek, Elijah Covert, Rafael I Bonilla, Eric Gilbert, Ceren Budak

原文摘要

The Pravda Network is a Russian state-aligned media aggregator, with over 110 websites and more than 15 million articles published since 2023. Given its prolific and repetitive output, emerging scholarship argues that the Pravda Network was built to influence AI systems. We conduct a large-scale audit of leading AI chatbots to understand: (1) the retrieval rates of Pravda Network articles, (2) the conditions of retrieval, and (3) whether chatbot responses affirm or caveat this content. We build a 10,000 prompt corpus from sampled Pravda Network headlines varied along two dimensions (headline rewording and user skepticism) and query 11 AI chatbots via the web interface (n=104,997 completed responses). Overall, we find susceptibility to Pravda Network retrieval to be infrequent---appearing in 7.3% of responses---and highly platform dependent---with three chatbots responsible for 94% of retrievals (You.com, Claude, and Copilot). Among the frontier models, Claude is an outlier: ChatGPT, Gemini, and Meta AI retrieved no Pravda Network articles, likely indicative of a domain-level filtering policy. All 11 chatbots, however, retrieved other Russian state-aligned media to some degree (median=13.56% of responses). When Pravda Network articles are surfaced, caveat rates vary widely by platform (from 5.3% to 76.2%), with You.com providing the fewest caveats. We also identify the tactic of headline washing: where 9.92% of sampled Pravda Network headlines attribute their reporting to other, often more credible, media outlets, while the articles themselves are republished from Russian state-aligned media. We discuss headline washing's potential to launder state media as independent reporting. With this audit, we provide a systematic analysis of AI chatbots' susceptibility to Russia's latest attempt to manipulate the information environment.

cs.AI