跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 10:52 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 13:47 — 2026-11-15 13:47(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 10:52最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 10:50(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15162

Stealthy, High-Impact False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grid Using Physics-Constrained GAN

Md. Mainul Islam, Hasan Kurban, Abdulrahman Takiddin, Muhammad Ismail, Rachad Atat, Erchin Serpedin

原文摘要

False data injection (FDI) attacks can distort power system state estimation while retaining plausible measurement patterns. Existing FDI methods trade stealth for impact or vice versa. They often assume access to internal grids, all-bus sensing, or defender models. In this paper, we propose a detector-agnostic physics-constrained generative adversarial network (PCGAN) that learns decoupled power-flow sensitivities from historical measurements of deployed sensors. The learned active-power-angle and reactive-power-voltage-magnitude relationships guide perturbations restricted to compromised channels, while adversarial training promotes realistic spatiotemporal patterns. We implement PCGAN and seven existing FDI attacks on the IEEE 300-bus system using one year of observed hourly demand from PJM Interconnection, a regional transmission organization in the United States, and synthetic bus-level load profiles. We compare their performance across 10%, 30%, 60%, and 100% compromised sensors. Attack stealth is assessed against ten machine-learning (ML) detectors and conventional bad-data detection (BDD) methods, while physical impact is quantified through nonlinear alternating-current weighted least-squares state estimation. PCGAN achieves 84.28% mean ML evasion and 22.31% mean spatial load misperception across the four scenarios. Its mean stealth-impact trade-off score reaches 18.69%, compared with 5.61% for the strongest competing attack. PCGAN also achieves 83.45% chi-square BDD evasion and 86.02% largest-normalized-residual BDD evasion. These results demonstrate a favorable stealth-impact balance under varying sensor-access levels and provide challenging attack cases for evaluating FDI detectors.

cs.LG · eess.SY

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10694

Perception, Not Reasoning, Limits Visual Theory of Mind

Mohamed Rayan Barhdadi, Syed Talal Wasim, Juergen Gall, Erchin Serpedin, Hasan Kurban

原文摘要

Vision-language models pass text-based false-belief probes at near-human levels but drop by over twenty percentage points on abstract panels the moment the same problem is conveyed visually. The consensus diagnosis is conceptual, prescribing new belief-reasoning modules. We argue the dominant bottleneck is perceptual: not what the model cannot reason about, but what it cannot see. We propose a five-condition dissociation protocol that holds the reasoning task constant while varying perceptual fidelity from visual only to text only, and quantify the result with the Perceptual Contribution Ratio, the share of the visual-to-text gap a given fidelity closes. We test this on two kinds of scenes: abstract 2D panels in the Heider--Simmel tradition, and naturalistic 3D game scenes from MuMA-ToM and MindPower. The evaluation covers seven VLMs and roughly 159,000 API calls. Ground-truth scaffolds substantially close the gap in every setting, and on the abstract panels and MuMA-ToM they match or exceed the text-only reasoning. Whereas scaffolds built by automatic parsers, including frontier VLMs, fail. The most common error in the visual-only condition is \emph{reality bias}, which accounts for 60\% of false-belief failures. Models report where an object actually is, not where an absent agent believes it is. This points to a perceptual front-end that fails to track which agents were present at each moment. Under the evaluated protocol, structured visual scene-state extraction, rather than belief inference, is the dominant bottleneck for visual ToM.

cs.CV · cs.AI · cs.CL · q-bio.NC

版本更新 · v3arXiv:2606.30901

GRAPE: Graph-Augmented Prototype Explanations for Interactive Medical Image Diagnosis

Rasul Khanbayov, Erchin Serpedin, Hasan Kurban

原文摘要

Prototype-based medical image classifiers present three clinical limitations: they treat findings as independent, silently amplify unsafe physician feedback, and require full retraining whenever a new finding is needed. We present GRAPE (Graph-Augmented Prototype Explanations), a unified architecture that targets all three challenges. First, a Graph Attention Task Head boosts macro-F1 by +13.8,pp over the prototype baseline on TBX11K but not on NIH ChestX-ray14, with no graph-specific benefit established. Second, a Concept-Mismatch Safety Check, to our knowledge the first such mechanism in prototype-based medical classifiers, warns when the model's dominant finding inside a doctor-drawn region conflicts with the claimed label, catching 85% of simulated erroneous annotations with no extra inference cost at a favorable operating point, though sensitivity falls substantially at clinically realistic false-positive budgets. Third, Open-Vocabulary Prototype Anchoring aligns visual prototypes to clinical text, allowing a new finding to be added from a single labeled image without modifying any other component, evaluated for localization only. On NIH ChestX-ray14, one Effusion example matched that concept's low fully-supervised Pointing Game ceiling in one run but not in a second. On TBX11K, prototype maps achieve 2.1x better lesion localization than end-to-end concept-based baselines. The graph head adds only +1~ms latency at interactive batch size. The project page is available at https://kurbanintelligencelab.github.io/GRAPE.

cs.CV