跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+6109新增论文
+5222其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 06:01 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 06:17各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 06:40 — 2026-11-05 06:40(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 06:01最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 06:17库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

14,786 已收录论文12,897 AI 相关3,089 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 05:58(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.04264

Reliability Stress Testing of RAG Retrieval under Query-Relevant Corpus Poisoning

Janet Sung, Kainan Zhou, Gangzhen Qian, Hang Xiao, Lu Yi

External text can affect a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system only after the retriever admits it to the model context. We stress this admission step while varying document content, attacker query information, per-target poison budget, and contamination scope. Across 623 Benchmarking Information Retrieval (BEIR) queries from SciFact and NFCorpus, five query-targeted documents per query reduce classical-retriever nDCG@10 by 40.2-61.5% in isolated-target stress. Full-query anchoring explains most Best Matching 25 (BM25) degradation, whereas appended text also shifts latent semantic analysis (LSA) and Hybrid rankings. A pretrained BGE-small validation reaches 100% target exposure for query-only P=5 on both datasets; adding the injection payload changes SciFact nDCG only from 0.269 to 0.271 and lowers NFCorpus exposure slightly to 98.8%, indicating that query anchoring remains the dominant retrieval-side factor for this dense model. Query length materially changes the interpretation of partial-information attacks: on 162 long SciFact queries, two random terms cover 19.9% of eligible terms and still yield 39.5% Hybrid target exposure. Multi-target contamination adds cross-target interference. Overlap-based admission can remove full-query poisons but may sharply reduce clean retrieval utility, and maximal marginal relevance (MMR) leaves exposure unchanged under the tested configuration. The study measures retrieval-layer failures, not downstream instruction following.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02643

SearchInject: Retrieval Exposure Control for Indirect Prompt Injection in Language-Model Search

Kainan Zhou, Gangzhen Qian, Janet Sung, Zhi Jing, Rong Bao, Qianru Lao

An indirect prompt injection can affect a search-augmented large language model only after its carrier page reaches model context. SearchInject controls this admission decision with a joint score combining retrieval relevance, search-abuse cues, instruction likelihood, and two relevance interactions. A quarantine threshold is selected under an empirical 0.5% clean-candidate false-quarantine constraint on a calibration split. Evaluation uses 300 held-out SciFact queries and held-out payload categories within four construction families already represented during development. Across 1,200 query-family outcomes per retriever, top-10 target exposure falls from 0.9408 to 0.1583 for BM25, from 0.9158 to 0.1508 for a normalized hybrid, and from 0.8450 to 0.1375 for latent semantic analysis. These are relative reductions of 83.2-83.7%; the largest absolute change in clean normalized discounted cumulative gain at rank 10 is 0.0018. The frozen threshold yields clean test false-quarantine rates of 0.59-0.65%, above the empirical calibration constraint. A query-level analytical reanalysis accounts for the repeated construction outcomes under an independent-query assumption. A separate 104-case generation follow-up records context removal but no confirmed undefended hijacks under a post hoc endpoint, so it cannot estimate a reduction in attack success. The evidence supports retrieval exposure control within the evaluated construction families; the benefit of the interaction terms at matched clean cost remains unresolved.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AI · cs.CY · cs.IR · cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38361

Manifest-Assisted Retrieval in Artificial Intelligence Search: Evidence Gaps and a Security Evaluation

Gangzhen Qian, Kainan Zhou, Chuhong Xu, Hang Xiao, Zhi Jing, Rong Bao, Lu Yi, Zhaoyi Li

The external sources retained in our non-systematic audit did not isolate the incremental security or utility effect of consuming /llms.txt while ordinary retrieval remained fixed. The initial audit covered 39 sources through August 16, 2026, with later targeted updates through October 14. A purposive 15-tool study observed no automatic requests in 45 trials at one endpoint; a non-probability log study found that 97% of domains with detected files received no recorded requests in May 2026. We separate publication, fetch, model use, and action; define five operational threat paths and paired security-utility estimands; and exercise deterministic pre-model controls with 30 author-defined parser fixtures. We also execute a reduced pilot: 24 tasks across eight sites, five conditions, and 120 real model responses, with ordinary evidence held fixed. Frozen automatic scoring identifies attacker-target adoption in $21/24$ raw adversarial responses, with one further response unresolved; the adversarial URLs-only condition has no known adoptions and one unresolved response. The pilot measures output changes conditional on supplied evidence, without live retrieval or external actions. Together, the framework and pilot distinguish manifest-content effects from publication, discovery, and downstream execution, while leaving full retrieval and agent evaluation open.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CR · cs.AI · cs.CE · cs.CL · cs.DB · cs.IR
arXiv ↗PDF ↗