跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文，按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描：2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库：2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 07:02 — 2026-11-16 07:02（北京时间） · 点击数字查看对应简报；AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查：2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本：2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间：2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常；新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

研究日报 / 周报 →按信源浏览 →

时间范围跟随排序：版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常，查看状态 →

找到 4 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33（北京时间）
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11560

LiveAsset: Learning Intent Assets from Corrective Interactions for Agent Runtime Control

Guanming Liu, Weihang Wang, Peng Zhang, Meng Wu, Kainan Tu, Jiahao Liu, Yu Zhang, Liuxin Zhang 等 11 位作者

原文摘要

Large language model (LLM) agents acting across web applications and online services often need multi-turn corrections to align their work with users' underspecified goals and preferences. In practice, users may identify problems in the current outcome without specifying the desired result, so learning user intentions requires interpreting each correction against the agent's preceding and revised outcomes. These expectations are often connected to a particular context, making it hard to know when they apply and how to ensure the agent later acts as the user expects. To this end, we propose LiveAsset, an intent harness that learns reusable intent assets from corrective interactions and uses them for runtime control of agent execution. LiveAsset jointly interprets each correction with the agent's original and revised results to infer user intent, incrementally updating the assets while preserving earlier requirements that remain applicable. The learned requirements guide agent execution from task entry and provide criteria for runtime verification, which uses the explanations to assess applicability before each reply is delivered and directs the agent to revise the result to address unmet requirements while preserving those already satisfied. Following a learning phase in which simulated users progressively reveal requirements through multi-turn corrections, we evaluate LiveAsset using same-task replay of the original requests on π-Bench, PERMA, and Vita and cross-task transfer on PAST-Bench and SkillEvolBench. Experiments show that LiveAsset better fulfills requirements learned from corrective interactions and improves performance on these benchmarks compared with memory, skill, and rule-based harness baselines. Code is available at github.com/landian60/LiveAsset.

cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2603.03325

IntPro: Context-Aware Intent Inference via Selective Retrieval from User History

Guanming Liu, Meng Wu, Peng Zhang, Yu Zhang, Yubo Shu, Xianliang Huang, Kainan Tu, Ning Gu 等 11 位作者

原文摘要

Accurately understanding user intent in context is essential for large language models (LLMs) to provide effective assistance. However, observed behavior may support multiple plausible intents, making the current context alone insufficient for identifying the user's underlying goal. A user's interaction history may contain recurring context-to-intent patterns that help disambiguate the current intent. Leveraging such historical patterns requires deciding whether to invoke retrieval for the current context and, if so, forming queries that express plausible intents rather than relying on contextual similarity alone. We present IntPro, a proxy agent that learns to either infer intent directly from the current context or generate candidate intent explanations to retrieve intent-aligned records from the user's history. We design intent explanations as a shared intent-oriented natural-language form that expresses the observed action, its functional goal, and a cue-to-intent rationale. Label-conditioned explanations represent historical records, while candidate explanations generated from the current context serve as retrieval queries in the same form. IntPro first learns direct and retrieval-conditioned inference through Direct-and-Retrieval supervised fine-tuning (SFT). IntPro then uses multi-turn GRPO with a retrieval-decision reward to jointly optimize intent prediction and selective retrieval mechanism. Experiments across three scenarios and three model backbones demonstrate that IntPro consistently improves context-aware intent inference.

cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.LG

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2606.14571

StreamMemBench: Streaming Evaluation of Agent Memory for Future-Oriented Assistance

Guanming Liu, Yuqi Ren, Hansu Gu, Peng Zhang, Weihang Wang, Jiahao Liu, Ning Gu, Tun Lu

原文摘要

A central role of personal-agent memory is to turn stored information and prior interactions into future-oriented assistance. In daily use, useful cues come from what the agent observes and how the user interacts with the agent, and the agent must carry them forward from the current request to similar future tasks. Existing memory benchmarks usually test dialogue recall or task improvement in isolation, leaving the trajectory from streaming observations to later assistance largely untested. We introduce StreamMemBench, a streaming benchmark that constructs a two-step task sequence around each evidence anchor from EgoLife egocentric streams. The initial task tests evidence use, while the follow-up task tests whether feedback and interaction experience are reused. Four metrics diagnose evidence recall, initial evidence use, feedback incorporation, and follow-up reuse. Experiments with eight memory systems across two backbones show that current systems often fail to use observed evidence or turn feedback into reliable follow-up behavior, even when evidence is stored or feedback is incorporated locally. StreamMemBench is publicly available at https://github.com/landian60/StreamMemBench.

cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.06065

ProcessPrefBench: Evaluating Cross-Task Transfer of Individual Process Preferences from Naturalistic Human-AI Interaction

Yiwen Yang, Guanming Liu

原文摘要

In natural human-AI dialogue, users' corrections, requests, and self-descriptions carry reusable signals about how they want work to be done. These signals reveal individual process preferences, user-specific standards for evidence, depth, analytical focus, procedure, and delivery. We ask whether a preference revealed in one dialogue can shape an assistant's later answer when the task does not restate it. ProcessPrefBench uses three months of natural dialogues from two knowledge workers to build 66 source-target cases separately judged for source evidence and target applicability. Sources are preselected, so the benchmark tests application rather than retrieval. We test three models with target-only, full-history, and distilled-preference prompts. Target-specific 0-2 rubrics score preference realization, and a task gate flags severe failures. Compared with target-only prompting, full-history and imperative distilled-preference prompting raise preference realization by 0.204 and 0.244 points on the 0-2 scale, respectively, with no reliable advantage from distillation. Fabricated-evidence failures rise from 5.8% under target-only prompting to 10.1% under full-history and 10.4% under imperative prompting. ProcessPrefBench highlights a tension in learning from dialogue, where drawing on prior interactions can improve preference realization yet also invite fabricated evidence. We hope it helps build assistants that honor a user's process preferences without sacrificing factual reliability.

cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗