跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2新增论文
+2其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 18:21 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 18:53 — 2026-11-12 18:53(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 18:21最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 18:18(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.13818

WAM is capable in BEHAVIOR-1K: the 2nd-place solution to the 2026 BEHAVIOR Challenge

Yelin He, Jiaquan Ye, Xinming Wei, Wenjie Xiao, Gengming Zhang, Guoting Wei, Xianbiao Qi, Rong Xiao

原文摘要

This work presents the 2nd-place solution (Team IF1001) to the 2026 BEHAVIOR Challenge, which evaluates mobile manipulation across 100 household tasks. Our method is built on a powerful world action model (WAM), Cosmos 3. We improve Cosmos 3 by using richer visual history, task-progress conditioning, and task-group and skill-specific LoRA adapters. During inference, we apply a separate progress estimator to supply task-progress context, and use task- and progress-conditioned routing to select a task-group or skill-specific policy, complemented by action-candidate aggregation, rolling inpainting, and task-specific temporal and gripper control. To meet the minimum inference requirement of 1 FPS, we use neither recursive self-improvement (RSI) nor agentic harness methods and rely on no closed-source models; during official private-test evaluation, our system handled concurrent requests across 100 evaluation ports with limited hardware resources, sustaining an average end-to-end inference rate above 2 FPS per port. Our method achieves a mean Q-score of 0.613 and a full-task success rate of 40.9%, averaged over 3 self-evaluation rounds across all 100 tasks. On the official private test set, with 20 instances per task, our system achieves a mean Q-score of 0.615 and a full-task success rate of 41.2%.

cs.RO