跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 05:41 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 06:23 — 2026-11-15 06:23(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 05:41最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 05:40(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2603.01055

MMCOMET: A Large-Scale Multimodal Commonsense Knowledge Graph for Visual Reasoning

Jinwoo Kim, Rina Carines Cabral, Dhita Putri Pratama, Eileen Wang, Hiba Arnaout, Shuo Yang, Danyang Liu, Seungyeon Ji 等 13 位作者

原文摘要

Commonsense knowledge is widely used to support multimodal reasoning and generation, yet existing resources are predominantly text-only and lack grounding in visual context. This limitation often leads to the retrieval of semantically related but visually misaligned knowledge, and can degrade downstream performance. We introduce MMCOMET, a large-scale multimodal commonsense knowledge graph that integrates physical, social, and eventive knowledge with visual grounding. MMCOMET extends ATOMIC2020 by associating each commonsense triple with representative images through a hybrid alignment pipeline, resulting in over 900K multimodal tuples spanning 19 relation types. We further establish a unified evaluation framework across diverse vision-language tasks, including visual commonsense reasoning, visual question answering, visual storytelling, image editing, and image captioning. Our analysis shows that multimodal grounding provides more contextually aligned and reliable knowledge compared to both text-only knowledge graphs and LLM-based knowledge generation, particularly in reasoning-intensive scenarios. At the same time, we observe that the effectiveness of external knowledge is task-dependent, and naive knowledge integration can introduce noise in perception-dominated settings. To mitigate this, we propose an adaptive knowledge router that dynamically selects optimal paths or bypass knowledge in harmful settings. MMCOMET provides a scalable multimodal commonsense resource and a benchmark for studying the role of grounded knowledge in multimodal systems.

cs.AI

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.307ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

In-depth Research Impact Summarization through Fine-Grained Temporal Citation Analysis

Hiba Arnaout Technische Universität Darmstadt, Noy Sternlicht Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Tom Hope Hebrew University, Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Iryna Gurevych Institute for Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence and Technology, Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence and Technische Universität Darmstadt

原文摘要

Understanding the impact of scientific publications is crucial for identifying breakthroughs and guiding future research. Traditional metrics based on citation counts often miss the nuanced ways a paper contributes to its field. In this work, we propose a new task: generating nuanced, expressive, and time-aware impact summaries that capture both praise (confirmation citations) and critique (correction citations) through the evolution of fine-grained citation intents. We introduce an evaluation framework tailored to this task, showing moderate to strong human correlation on subjective metrics such as insightfulness. Expert feedback from professors reveals a strong interest in these summaries and suggests future improvements. Data and code are made available.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.347ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Responsible Evaluation of AI for Mental Health

Hiba Arnaout Technische Universität Darmstadt, Anmol Goel Technische Universität Darmstadt, H. Andrew Schwartz, Steffen T. Eberhardt Trier University, Dana Atzil-Slonim Bar-Ilan University, Gavin Doherty University of Dublin, Trinity College, Brian Schwartz Trier University, Wolfgang Lutz Trier University 等 16 位作者

原文摘要

Although artificial intelligence (AI) shows growing promise for mental health care, current approaches to evaluating AI tools in this domain remain fragmented and poorly aligned with clinical practice, social context, and first-hand user experience. This paper argues for a rethinking of responsible evaluation – what is measured, by whom, and for what purpose – by introducing an interdisciplinary framework that integrates clinical soundness, social context, and equity, providing a structured basis for evaluation. Through an analysis of 135 recent *CL publications, we identify recurring limitations, including over-reliance on generic metrics that do not capture clinical validity, therapeutic appropriateness, or user experience, limited participation from mental health professionals, and insufficient attention to safety and equity. To address these gaps, we propose a taxonomy of AI mental health support types – assessment-, intervention-, and information synthesis-oriented – each with distinct risks and evaluative requirements, and illustrate its use through case studies.

cs.CL · cs.AI

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表