跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+3534新增论文
+3239其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+99新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 00:46 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 00:56 — 2026-11-06 00:56(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 00:46最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 00:44(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.04183

Agentic Path Maps: Exposing an Agent's Traversal Through the Garden of Forking Paths

Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, Hafsah Usman, Daniel Mitroshkov, Emily Reif, Nino Migineishvili, Lakshya Chauhan. Kevin Yu, Jeffrey Heer, Daniel S. Weld

When an AI agent executes an underspecified task, it embeds choices that may contradict unarticulated user context and preferences. However, interrupting the user for clarification on all such decisions is untenable. How might agents communicate impactful, but unexplored, paths to the user after execution? To investigate, we first distill a design space for communicating alternative paths, supporting the generation of new systems and structuring dimensions of future study. We then measure the impact of one vital design space dimension on user comprehension: the number of alternatives displayed. Through a user study (n=48) in the data analysis domain, we find that participants rarely consider alternative paths of their own volition, but AI overreliance reduces when alternative paths are visualized for them. By revealing paths the agent did not take, we demonstrate how users can better interpret results and incorporate personal context.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.HC · cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗