Hao Li, Zhengkun Zhang, Gangqiang Hu, Zhen Zhang, Yude Gao, Dai Dai, Jing Liu
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is expanding from tasks with well-defined correctness signals, such as mathematics and code, toward multifaceted quality requirements specified by multi-dimensional rubrics. Since policy optimization consumes one scalar per rollout, rubric-based pipelines must map multiple criterion scores into a scalar reward. This aggregation is often treated as score scaling, but it implicitly determines how quality dimensions trade off during training. The prevailing practice, normalizing each criterion and taking a linear combination, assumes that cardinal score differences are comparable across criteria and that gains on one criterion compensate for failures on another; both assumptions are unreliable when criteria are semantically heterogeneous. We propose Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rubric-based Ranking (RLVR$^2$), a verifiable ranking paradigm for rubric-based RLVR. For each criterion, RLVR$^2$ converts rubric scores into criterion-specific within-group ordinal outcomes, recovers a latent utility from the resulting comparison matrix, and merges these utilities into one training signal. By retaining only within-group ordering and discarding raw score magnitudes, RLVR$^2$ avoids calibrating heterogeneous rubric scales. It further supports objective-preserving attribute adjustment: auxiliary attributes that correlate with observed rankings but are not training objectives can enter the estimation without expanding the rubric or rewarding them directly. Across three model scales and 16 benchmarks, RLVR$^2$ consistently outperforms representative rubric-based baselines, achieving the best overall performance on most benchmarks at every scale. Analysis shows it controls systematic effects tied to reasoning efficiency and response formatting while preserving the quality objective.
Yujing Liu, Yixin Liu, Yu Zheng, Lianhua Chi, Alan Wee-Chung Liew, Heng Tao Shen, Shirui Pan
Link prediction (LP) is a widely applied task in graph learning. Conventional LP approaches typically follow a dataset-specific paradigm, requiring independent training for each graph and incurring high computational and maintenance costs in large-scale applications. Motivated by these limitations, recent work explores Universal Link Prediction (ULP), aiming to enable training-free inference on arbitrary unseen graphs. However, existing methods primarily rely on subgraph sampling strategies to construct universal representations, which are unable to capture higher-order information due to the exponential growth of higher-order neighborhoods. As a result, they often under-perform on graphs where long-range signals are essential, such as biological networks. Moreover, their prediction models are typically domain-agnostic and lack the ability to adapt to different graph domains, leading to limited generalization. To address these challenges, we propose an Atlas-based Universal Link Prediction framework (AtlasULP), which introduces the relation atlas to capture structural associations between node pairs from both global and local perspectives, enabling a comprehensive characterization of connectivity signals across diverse graph domains. Building upon this representation, we develop a domain-guided prompting ULP model, which generates domain-aware prompt tokens from contextual structures and performs prompt-guided in-context prediction for adaptive link inference. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AtlasULP consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods across diverse graph domains.
Real-world forgery is inherently heterogeneous: it manifests not only as digital manipulation but also as physical spoofing, and is carried not only by images but also by videos. Despite substantial progress, a unified anti-forgery foundation model covering such a broad threat spectrum remains absent. In this paper, we present Venus-DefakerOne2, which substantially extends the forensic capability boundary along both the forgery-form and media-type dimensions. Trained on tens of millions of open-source and in-house samples, it incorporates two key designs. Tide-Style-Tuning alternates LoRA and full-parameter fine-tuning to balance computational efficiency, generalization, and hard-sample fitting while mitigating catastrophic forgetting. Entropy-based Test Adaptation determines the optimal prediction modality by analyzing prediction entropy. Venus-DefakerOne2 achieves new state-of-the-art performance across a comprehensive suite of benchmarks, including DeepFake faces (96.7%), AI-generated images (93.3%), tampered documents (87.6%), manipulated natural images (89.6%), physical spoofs (93.1%), and AI-generated videos (96.0%). It significantly outperforms both specialized expert models and its predecessor, DefakerOne, establishing itself as a powerful and versatile foundation model for binary-decision forensic tasks.
Realizing Embodied AI for Science requires robots to translate experimental goals into reliable physical procedures, reducing hazardous and repetitive human work while generating evidence for scientific discovery. Although language-based planning and learned manipulation provide complementary capabilities, their integration requires robots to adapt subsequent operations to actual execution outcomes. For example, an unsuccessful placement changes what must be done next, even when the experimental goal remains unchanged. Existing benchmarks assess planning, manipulation, and laboratory workflows through task completion and reasoning or execution metrics; however, aggregate performance leaves the connection between outcome-dependent choices and physical execution unresolved. To address this evaluation gap, we introduce Labference, a benchmark for evaluating how observed physical outcomes guide subsequent choices and how those choices translate into robotic laboratory actions. Its evaluation protocol is designed to test outcome-dependent behavioral adaptation through controlled evidence variations, while independently measuring operation selection, physical execution, and task completion. Matched Oracle-assisted continuations from shared checkpoints then assess which forms of support improve subsequent choices and task completion. Initial weighing evaluations reveal target-selection errors in the tested VLA policies despite successful object transfers, whereas GPT-driven control achieves correct selection but encounters execution failures and substantial computation costs. Together, these findings highlight the need to connect task-appropriate reasoning with reliable, timely action. By making this connection measurable and diagnosable, Labference supports targeted improvements toward autonomous experimentation for Embodied AI for Science.
Ruixin Fan, Weining Wang, Jiahui Sun, Tailai Chen, Jing Liu
Unified multimodal models (UMMs) jointly support visual understanding and image generation, yet information flow between these two capabilities remains largely asymmetric: understanding representations routinely condition generation, whereas generative representations are rarely reused for multimodal reasoning. In this work, we investigate whether intermediate representations from a UMM's native diffusion branch can enhance spatial reasoning without compromising general multimodal understanding. We propose DiFuse, which selectively incorporates intermediate diffusion representations into the understanding pathway of UMMs. Through systematic layer-wise analysis, we identify which diffusion representations are most informative and where they can be integrated with minimal interference to semantic processing. Guided by these findings, DiFuse spatially aligns diffusion features with visual tokens and injects them into selected multimodal decoder layers via residual fusion. Extensive experiments on UniWorld-V1 show that, DiFuse consistently improves spatial reasoning over a matched SFT baseline while maintaining broadly comparable performance on general multimodal benchmarks. Further analyses show that these gains depend critically on the choice of diffusion representations, injection positions, and the preservation of spatial correspondence between diffusion features and visual tokens. Results on OmniGen2 further demonstrate the transferability of DiFuse across unified multimodal architectures. Overall, our findings show that native diffusion representations can provide complementary spatial cues for multimodal reasoning when selectively integrated in a structure-preserving manner.
Multimodal latent-space reasoning aims to replace explicit thinking with images by performing visual reasoning directly in a compact latent space. However, existing approaches largely rely on visual supervision and produce latent representations that lack sufficient semantic richness, limiting their ability to support diverse region-level reasoning tasks. In this work, we introduce Semantic-Enriched Latent Visual Reasoning (SLVR), a two-stage learning framework that enriches latent representations with attribute-level visual semantics and aligns them with diverse reasoning objectives. In the first stage, SLVR learns semantically enriched region-centric latents under fine-grained attribute supervision. In the second stage, we design Multi-query Group Relative Policy Optimization (M-GRPO) to align latent representations across multiple queries grounded in the same region. To support this framework, we construct SLV-Set, comprising approximately 400K region-level attribute annotations and 800K multi-query question answering samples, and introduce SV-QA, a benchmark that evaluates latent reasoning under semantic variation. Experiments demonstrate that SLVR improves the robustness and semantic consistency of latent visual reasoning compared to existing baselines.
Infrared--visible (IR--VIS) multi-modal perception supports robust scene understanding under challenging illumination. Infrared and visible images are often misaligned due to platform motion, viewpoint changes, and modality-dependent distortions, causing registration errors to propagate into subsequent fusion and detection stages. We propose TriDifNet, a unified three-task diffusion network for end-to-end RGB-T perception. To the best of our knowledge, TriDifNet is the first diffusion-based network that jointly optimizes registration, fusion, and detection for misaligned RGB-T pedestrian perception. TriDifNet consists of three diffusion-based modules, i.e., the Registration Diffusion Module (RegDM), the Fusion Diffusion Module (FusDM), and the Detection Diffusion Module (DetDM). RegDM aligns the unaligned infrared image to the optical reference by estimating a dense deformation field. FusDM performs residual conditional diffusion to generate a detection-oriented fused representation with optical structural cues and complementary infrared saliency. DetDM formulates pedestrian detection as an iterative denoising process in bounding-box space. To couple the three tasks, TriDifNet introduces a closed-loop optimization mechanism, where detection semantics guide fusion and registration, and the fusion result further regularizes geometric alignment. A stage-wise progressive training strategy and a lightweight Nash multi-task learning (Nash-MTL)-based late-stage refinement are further adopted to balance registration, fusion, and detection optimization. Extensive experiments on the KAIST multispectral pedestrian benchmark show that TriDifNet achieves superior downstream detection performance under misaligned RGB-T settings. Against strong system-level competitors, TriDifNet achieves 65.44\% Recall, 57.55\% mAP$_{50}$, and 26.83\% mAP$_{50:95}$.
What binds large language models on auditable, hypothesis-driven decision tasks, where every candidate can be checked against the evidence? On the public TCMEval-SDT benchmark for Traditional Chinese Medicine syndrome differentiation (200 cases), the binding constraint is output discipline and reasoning structure, not model capability alone: two years of model scaling move zero-shot scores by only -0.03 to +0.08, while output-discipline failures (non-terminating reasoning, format non-compliance, large run-to-run spread) persist even in frontier models. We test this with a model-agnostic agent framework formalizing decision making as a five-stage closed loop, enforced by a candidate x evidence matrix falsification protocol: every candidate is judged against every evidence item, at least half of the candidates must be falsified before a conclusion is licensed, and survivors are emitted in a machine-verifiable single-line format. Across five base models, the effect is sign-conditional on zero-shot output discipline: it rescues models whose discipline fails (DeepSeek-V4-Flash: +0.267/+0.271, entirely termination rescue), reduces a high-variance model's run-to-run standard deviation from 0.218 to 0.007 (Kimi K3), and significantly costs already-disciplined models (-0.087 to -0.120 on budget-matched Qwen3-4B/32B). Ablations attribute the cost to the candidate-bounded format layer and show the effect is independent of injected knowledge content (protocol-knowledge decoupling). The protocol also transfers to misinformation-robust mathematical reasoning, detecting injected false premises at 89.8% recall with a 6.8% false-positive rate (MCC 0.54; a flag-everything baseline scores 0) and restoring accuracy to the no-misinformation ceiling. Where zero-shot output discipline is weak, the reasoning protocol sets the floor; base-model capability always sets the ceiling.
Jiatong Ma Institute of automation, Chinese academy of science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Longteng Guo Institute of automation, Chinese academy of science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yuchen Liu, Zijia Zhao, Dongze Hao, Xuanxu Lin Institute of automation, Chinese academy of science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jing Liu Institute of automation, Chinese academy of science
We present M^3-VQA, a novel knowledge-based Visual Question Answering (VQA) benchmark, to enhance the evaluation of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in fine-grained multimodal entity understanding and complex multi-hop reasoning. Unlike existing VQA datasets that focus on coarse-grained categories and simple reasoning over single entities, M^3-VQA introduces diverse multi-entity questions involving multiple distinct entities from both visual and textual sources. It requires models to perform both sequential and parallel multi-hop reasoning across multiple documents, supported by traceable, detailed evidence and a curated multimodal knowledge base. We evaluate 16 leading MLLMs under three settings: without external knowledge, with gold evidence, and with retrieval-augmented input. The poor results reveal significant challenges for MLLMs in knowledge acquisition and reasoning. Models perform poorly without external information but improve markedly when provided with precise evidence. Furthermore, reasoning-aware agentic retrieval surpasses heuristic methods, highlighting the importance of structured reasoning for complex multimodal understanding. M^3-VQA presents a more challenging evaluation for advancing the multimodal reasoning capabilities of MLLMs. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/CASIA-IVA-Lab/M3VQA.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Yuhao Wang Nanyang Technological University, Ruiyang Ren, Yucheng Wang, Xin Zhao Renmin University of China, Jing Liu Baidu, Hua Wu, Haifeng Wang Baidu
Long-form question answering (LFQA) requires open-ended long-form responses that synthesize coherent, factually grounded content from multi-source evidence. This makes reinforcement learning (RL) reward design critical. The reward must be verifiable for faithful grounding and stable optimization. However, many standard rewards assume a unique target with an exact-match notion of correctness, which fits short-form QA and math but breaks in LFQA. As a result, current RAG systems still lack verifiable reward mechanisms, yielding unstable feedback signals and suboptimal optimization outcomes. We propose RioRAG, a framework for reinforced verifiable informativeness optimization. First, it defines informativeness as a measurable and externally verifiable objective for RL. Second, RioRAG uses nugget-centric verification with cross-source checks to enable self-evolution of smaller LLMs and to provide denser, action-discriminative rewards that mitigate reward sparsity and stabilize optimization. This formulation avoids handcrafted supervision for the policy model and strong teacher-model distillation, relying instead on externally verifiable feedback. Experiments on LongFact and RAGChecker show that RioRAG achieves higher factual recall and faithfulness, establishing verifiable reward modeling as a foundation for trustworthy long-form RAG. Our codes are available at https://github.com/RUCAIBox/RioRAG.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表