跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-14 23:29 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 00:18 — 2026-11-15 00:18(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-14 23:29最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-14 23:28(北京时间)
版本更新 · v5arXiv:2603.25670

Uncertainty-Guided Label Rebalancing for CPS Safety Monitoring

John Ayotunde, Qinghua Xu, Guancheng Wang, Lionel C. Briand

原文摘要

Safety monitoring is essential for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) such as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). However, unsafe events are rare in CPS operations, creating class imbalance that degrades data-driven safety predictors. Behavioral uncertainty, reflected in erratic control signals or rapid heading changes, is often correlated with safety outcomes: uncertain behaviors occur more often during unsafe operation. Yet safety monitoring rarely exploits it. We propose U-Balance, a supervised approach that leverages behavioral uncertainty to rebalance datasets before training a safety predictor. U-Balance first trains a GatedMLP-based uncertainty predictor that represents telemetry windows using distributional kinematic features and outputs an uncertainty score. Its uncertainty-guided label rebalancing (uLNR) mechanism probabilistically relabels $\textit{safe}$ windows with unusually high uncertainty as $\textit{unsafe}$, enriching the minority class without synthesizing data. A safety predictor is then trained on the rebalanced dataset. We evaluate U-Balance on a UAV benchmark and ForEnt, a quadruped-robot entrapment dataset. On UAV, U-Balance achieves F1/AUROC/AUPRC of $0.801/0.972/0.776$, outperforming the strongest safety-prediction baselines by 14.3/2.2/6.1 percentage points ($\textit{pp}$), respectively. While the strongest baseline varies across metrics (MLP for F1 and AUPRC; CNN for AUROC), U-Balance leads on all three. On ForEnt, it achieves $0.522/0.806/0.323$, outperforming the strongest baselines by 4.4/9.2/1.4 $\textit{pp}$. Using the same Bi-LSTM safety predictor, uLNR outperforms the strongest alternative rebalancing methods by 17.0/4.1/8.2 $\textit{pp}$ on UAV and 2.3/6.5/1.9 on ForEnt. uLNR also outperforms Early and Late Fusion on both datasets. To our knowledge, this work is the first to use behavioral uncertainty for dataset rebalancing in CPS safety monitoring.

cs.LG · cs.SE