Accurate oriented detection requires boxes to follow object boundaries, yet small errors in the coupled center, size, and angle estimates can displace long boundaries even when an object is correctly classified. We propose NIF, a plug-in refinement branch that represents box geometry with normal-intersection fields. Given a coarse oriented box, it samples local features at 20 boundary anchors and predicts signed distances along their outward normals. These observations have an exact affine representation in five rectangle parameters; a differentiable projection uses error-aware reliability weights to recover a geometrically consistent box. Tangential pooling preserves the normal-position profile, while the shared projection adds 0.132M parameters. On DOTA-v1.0, NIF obtains 77.98%, 79.03%, and 79.32% mAP with Oriented R-CNN, Strip R-CNN, and LSKNet-S, respectively; LSKNet-S gives the strongest single-scale result among the compared methods. NIF also reaches 68.19% mAP on DIOR-R and improves matched FAIR1M-v1.0 and DIOR-R baselines by 0.30% and 0.71%, respectively. On HRSC2016, it raises mean IoU from 0.867 to 0.888 while reducing field error by 24.5%. Finally, with four different detector frameworks frozen, NIF improves relative AP75 by 1.55-4.16% and COCO-style mAP by 0.37-3.76%, without detector retraining. Upon acceptance of this paper, we will publicly release the code at https://github.com/zsk466991125-collab/Normal-Intersection-Fields.
Long-lived agents rely on persistent memory of users, tasks and decisions, and this memory must stay consistent with a world that keeps changing. When an upstream fact changes, however, memory systems can revise the contradicted memory itself while the beliefs, plans and actions derived from it remain accepted, even though they have lost their support. We therefore formulate dependency-aware state revision, which asks not only what changed but also which dependent states should no longer be trusted. To address it, StateGraph maintains an evolving state dependency graph whose edges are recovered from interaction histories. Its core design is counterfactual verification: each candidate edge is tested by asking whether the dependent state would survive the loss of its premise, which separates support dependence from semantic relatedness, and revision then invalidates a dependent state only when a strict dependency fails and no independent support path survives. To test this design, we introduce StateChangeBench, a controlled benchmark of 50 author-constructed cases annotated with cascade depth, hard negatives and action consequences. On it, StateGraph's Impact-F1 margin over a CUPMem reimplementation is 6.9 percentage points at depth 1 and 26.0 at depth 3+. On public long-term memory benchmarks, its point estimates are comparable to or higher than those of the evaluated baselines on most datasets. These results provide initial evidence that explicit dependency tracking can improve selective memory revision under changing conditions.
Wenjun Wang, Yuchen Fang, Fengrui Liu, Zibo Liang, Kai Zheng
Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown remarkable capabilities in autonomous decision-making by generating sequential trajectories of states, actions, and observations. However, in complex, long-horizon tasks, these agents frequently suffer from compounding errors and struggle to recover from failures. Despite advances in experience memory, extracting reliable and transferable correction knowledge from historical trajectories remains challenging. Existing methods, whether based on test-time reflection or offline memory construction, largely rely on LLMs to diagnose failures and formulate corrective strategies, which can produce brittle or task-specific insights that are difficult to generalize. To address this challenge, we propose Experience Memory Graph (EMG), a framework that reformulates agent failure recovery as a graph matching problem. During offline construction on the training set, we convert both failed exploration trajectories and successful expert trajectories into directed action decision graphs. By matching these graphs, we extract common subgraphs and graph edit paths that explicitly indicate how to correct failures, and store them in a memory graph with intra-task nodes and cross-task edges. At test time, EMG retrieves relevant insights and guides the agent in a single test-time attempt without additional reflection-and-replay rounds. Experiments on ALFWorld and ScienceWorld demonstrate consistent improvements over the evaluated memory construction and competitive baselines across seen and unseen splits.
Junyi Zhou City University of Hong Kong, Qiyuan Zhang City University of Hong Kong, Yufei Wang Huawei Technologies Ltd., Fuyuan Lyu Vatic Labs, Yidong Ming, Can Xu Tencent Hunyuan, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng Microsoft 等 11 位作者
As Large Language Model (LLM) alignment evolves from simple completions to complex, highly sophisticated generation, Reward Models are increasingly shifting toward rubric-guided evaluation to mitigate surface-level biases. However, the community lacks a unified benchmark to assess this evaluation paradigm, as existing benchmarks lack both the discriminative complexity and the ground-truth rubric annotations required for rigorous analysis. To bridge this gap, we introduce RubricBench, a curated benchmark with 1,147 pairwise comparisons specifically designed to assess the reliability of rubric-based evaluation. Our construction employs a multi-dimensional filtration pipeline to target hard samples featuring nuanced input complexity and misleading surface bias, augmenting each with expert-annotated, atomic rubrics derived strictly from instructions. Comprehensive experiments reveal a substantial capability gap between human-annotated and model-generated rubrics, indicating that even state-of-the-art models struggle to autonomously specify valid evaluation criteria, lagging considerably behind human-guided performance.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表