Neural language models (LMs) have been shown to capture complex linguistic patterns, yet their utility in understanding human language and more broadly, human cognition, remains debated. While existing work in this area often evaluates human-machine alignment, few studies attempt to translate findings from this enterprise into novel insights about humans. To this end, we propose a systematic framework for hypothesis generation that uses LMs to simulate outcomes of experiments that do not yet exist in the literature. We instantiate this framework in the context of a specific research question in child language development: dative verb acquisition and cross-structural generalization. Through this instantiation, we derive two novel, untested hypotheses: (1) the alignment between argument ordering and discourse prominence features of exposure contexts modulates how children generalize new verbs to unobserved structures; and (2) that this alignment in the first postverbal argument of the exposure context has a more noteworthy effect. Additionally, we also design a set of experiments that can test these hypotheses in the lab with children. This work contributes both a domain-general framework for systematic hypothesis generation via simulated learners and domain-specific, lab-testable hypotheses for child language acquisition research.
Selecting high-quality training data can reduce computation cost for LLM fine-tuning. Prior work on data selection developed a variety of difficulty-based scores, motivated by the intuition that harder examples are more informative. While effective for smaller classification models, we find that such methods often fail to outperform random selection for LLM fine-tuning. Our analysis reveals that random selection performs better because it is more representative of the underlying input space---i.e., has better coverage. To validate the importance of coverage, we implement a simple clustering-based selection method which selects data that is more representative of the underlying input distribution. On a set of diverse single-domain tasks, this method yields performance at or above that of random selection. On the diverse, multi-domain Tülu 3 mixture, where random sampling no longer guarantees a balanced subset, our method outperforms all methods. Overall, our results indicate that prioritizing coverage over difficulty leads to more effective data selection for LLM fine-tuning.
Tianyang Xu Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago, Marcelo Sandoval-Castañeda Adobe Systems and Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago, Karen Livescu, Greg Shakhnarovich, Kanishka Misra University of Texas at Austin
原文摘要
What is the interplay between semantic representations learned by language models (LM) from surface form alone to those learned from more grounded evidence? We study this question for a scenario where part of the input comes from a different modality—in our case, in a vision-language model (VLM), where a pretrained LM is aligned with a pretrained image encoder. As a case study we focus on the task of predicting hypernyms of objects represented in images. We do so in a VLM setup where the image encoder and LM are kept frozen, and only the intermediate mappings are learned. We progressively deprive the VLM of explicit evidence for hypernyms, and test whether the knowledge is recoverable from the LM. We find that the LMs we study can recover this knowledge and generalize even in the most extreme version of this experiment (when the model receives no evidence of a hypernym during training). Additional experiments suggest that this cross-modal taxonomic generalization persists under counterfactual image–label mappings only when the counterfactual data have high visual similarity within each category. Taken together, these findings suggest that cross-modal generalization in LMs arises from an interaction between linguistic structure and the information present in the input.
cs.CL · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表