跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 04:40 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 04:48 — 2026-11-15 04:48(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 04:40最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 04:38(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11914

CRAFT-GBM: Selecting Best Features for Gradient-Boosted Machine Learning

Basil Kuok, Yi Zhou, Yao Xuan, Shuping Li, Ke-Wei Huang

原文摘要

Feature subsampling is used to accelerate gradient-boosted trees, yet standard approaches fix the feature count in advance and largely ignore the split-gain evidence accumulated during training. We introduce CRAFT-GBM (Confidence-Ranked Adaptive Feature Tracking), a native LightGBM extension that uses this evidence to adapt which---and, by default, how many---features are searched each boosting round. CRAFT-GBM transforms root-split gains into bounded observations and constructs joint time-uniform bounds valid under adaptive, non-stationary training histories. In its default endogenous mode, after initialization, CRAFT-GBM retains exactly the features that cannot yet be ruled out as best, letting the selected feature-set size $K_t$ emerge from training history rather than a pre-specified fraction. With probability at least $1-δ$, every feature with the largest expected gain is retained jointly across all rounds after initialization. When a feature fraction $f$ is specified instead, CRAFT-GBM ranks features by their interval point estimates and provides an approximate top-$K$ guarantee for feature budget $K_f$. We implement CRAFT-GBM within LightGBM while preserving its native feature-bundling representation, and evaluate it across 14 public and synthetic dataset families and four noise-augmented settings. In the fully endogenous setting, CRAFT-GBM reduces per-fit training time by 39.74\% with 1.04\% lower test loss in the geometric mean across all 18 RQ1 experiments. Under pre-specified feature fraction $f$, Exogenous CRAFT-GBM also yields aggregate training-time reductions up to 13.52 percentage points larger than random feature subsampling, with no increase in aggregate test loss relative to full-feature LightGBM. Accumulated training evidence can thus support adaptive feature search with statistical guarantees while retaining the practical advantages of native gradient boosting.

cs.LG · math.ST

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1048ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

The Proxy Presumption: From Semantic Embeddings to Valid Social Measures

Baishi Li, Ta Yu, Kelvin J.L. Koa National University of Singapore, Ke-Wei Huang

原文摘要

Natural Language Processing is rapidly evolving into a primary instrument for Computational Social Science, with researchers increasingly using embeddings to measure latent constructs such as novelty, creativity, and bias. However, this transition faces a fundamental validity challenge: the “Proxy Presumption,” or the reliance on geometric properties (e.g., cosine distance) as direct measures of social concepts. We argue that without explicit validation, unsupervised representations remain entangled mixtures of the target construct (C) and confounding attributes (Z) like topic, style, and authorship. To bridge the gap between semantic embeddings and valid social measures, we introduce the Construct Validity Protocol (CVP). Drawing on causal representation learning and psychometrics, the CVP offers a rigorous pipeline from conceptualization to quantitative verification. We further propose Counterfactual Neutralization, a novel method using LLMs to reduce confounding in embedding space. By providing a standardized Validity Suite—including tests for discriminant, incremental, and predictive validity—this work offers the community a toolkit to transform heuristic proxies into robust, scientifically defensible instruments.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表