跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+3698新增论文
+2811其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+76新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 00:46 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 00:51各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 00:52 — 2026-11-05 00:52(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 00:46最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 00:51库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

12,375 已收录论文10,486 AI 相关3,088 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 00:44(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.39413

How Specific Do I Need to Be? Effects of User Query Underspecification on Deep Research Agents

Yi Wen, Xiangjue Dong, Bingxuan Li, Hangxiao Zhu, Leo Zhicheng Liu, Yu Zhang, James Caverlee

Deep research agents (DRAs) conduct long-horizon reasoning, search, and literature synthesis to provide long-form answers to complex, domain-specific questions. These agents are typically trained and evaluated on fully specified user queries. However, real-world user queries can often be underspecified. We introduce UNDERSPEC-DR, a framework for systematically evaluating how underspecified queries affect agents' final answer quality and intermediate search behavior. Across three DRAs we evaluated, underspecification substantially reduces how well DRA's answers fulfill users' information needs, even though they remain grounded in cited evidence. Our analysis of intermediate search behavior suggests a possible explanation: DRAs conduct broader searches that draw less on the original user query but rely more on their learned prior during training, which can be misaligned with users' intent. Our findings reveal the vulnerability of current DRAs to underspecified user queries and inform future efforts to build DRAs that proactively recognize when additional user input is needed to reliably complete deep research tasks.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL
arXiv ↗PDF ↗