Yiwei Chen, Lichi Li, Kai Cheung, Vinny Parla, Ganesh Sundaram
We study the task of CVE-conditioned exploit generation, where a model drafts proof-of-concept (PoC) exploits given software vulnerability context. We adopt a data-centric approach, constructing a high-quality dataset via multi-stage preprocessing and introducing a scalable evaluation framework with LLM-as-judge and fine-grained rubrics. Under this unified setup, we benchmark 17 large language models across 8 evaluation criteria, providing systematic insights into their zero-shot capabilities. We further show that a compact 8B open-weight model, when fine-tuned on curated data, achieves over 42.5% improvement in exploit quality and rivals some proprietary models when combined with simple test-time rejection strategies. Our results highlight the importance of data quality, structured supervision, and evaluation design for reliable exploit generation, suggesting that these factors can be as critical as model scale in adapting LLMs to cybersecurity tasks.
Yifan Li, Lichi Li, Anh Dao, Xinyu Zhou, Wenjun Huang, Tianyi Ma, Yicheng Qiao, Zheda Mai 等 18 位作者
Visual large language models (VLLMs) are increasingly used as embodied agents, yet industrial warehouses demand more than reaching a goal: agents must navigate safely around moving workers and vehicles. To evaluate embodied agents' goal reaching and safety, we introduce IndustryNav, a simulation environment with 24 warehouse scenes for closed-loop navigation to specified destinations. Alongside task success and efficiency, we introduce safety-aware metrics that capture collisions and near-collision warnings along each trajectory. Experiments with eleven leading open- and closed-source VLLMs and three navigation baselines show that agents can reach their goals yet collide with moving obstacles, exposing a gap between success and safe navigation. This gap matters in safety-critical settings, where a single collision can end the task. IndustryNav also supports policy learning through automated oracle trajectories and simulator interaction, with held-out scenes for generalization tests. These experiments show that policies can succeed on new routes in familiar warehouses yet fail to transfer to held-out layouts, making cross-scene generalization an open challenge.
Can AI agents autonomously train useful language models and improve them using feedback from users? We introduce RSI Arena, a two-stage study of autonomous post-training as a step toward recursive self-improvement. Ten frontier models act as training agents, each starting from NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base. During a six-day first stage, each agent has 1,000 GPU-hours and $300 in API credit on a shared 64-GPU cluster, independently selecting data, implementing training procedures, and choosing checkpoints. We evaluate their models on 20 benchmarks and through blind human evaluations. All ten agents produce working assistants, with the strongest model, trained by GPT-6 Astra, closing a median of 76% of the base-to-Instruct gap across 12 capability benchmarks. Its human-preference rating is also close to NVIDIA Instruct after statistical adjustment for answer length and formatting. In Stage 2, each agent receives the comparison records and votes involving its Stage 1 model and is given three additional days for further training. Using NVIDIA Instruct as a common reference across the two evaluation rounds, we observe an improvement from Stage 1 to Stage 2 in the style-adjusted relative rating of eight of the ten models. We show that benchmark gains were modest, with no clear link to preference gains, while some agents encouraged longer responses and one model showed increased harmful compliance on StrongREJECT. RSI Arena provides an auditable setting for studying how human feedback can guide autonomous model development. It takes a step toward recursive self-improvement with human feedback (RSIHF), in which people help define what improvement means for the AI systems they use.