跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+5178新增论文
+4291其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 02:52 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 03:04各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 03:05 — 2026-11-05 03:05(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 02:52最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 03:04库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

13,855 已收录论文11,966 AI 相关3,088 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 02:50(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.02662

GARV: Graph-Aware Refinement and Safety Verification for High-Level Robot Plans

Stabak Das, Priyesh Ranjan, Xiangfang Li, Lijun Qian

High-level robot actions such as goto(region) can hide intermediate traversal, allowing a monitor of the listed actions to accept a plan whose graph-level execution violates a safety rule. We present Graph-Aware Refinement and Verification (GARV), which composes graph-grounded action contracts with a safety monitor to produce a model-relative certificate or counterexample and, when route choice is enforceable, a minimum-cost safe refinement. In a 28-case controlled audit, refinement exposed all 12 targeted hidden hazards and produced the expected verdicts on 16 controls; a separate 14-case SPINE-RoboGuard instantiation yielded two false-safe cases and five action-interface errors. In standalone finite-graph simulation, all 16 designed cases met their expected outcomes, and product verification agreed with exhaustive enumeration on classification, minimum safe hop count, and witness safety in 160 comparisons across 40 graphs. Across 90 graph-contract evaluations on 30 graphs with a hazard deliberately placed on the selected shortest route, GARV found a safe refinement in 72 evaluations and no safe route within the permitted hop bound in 18. For the static forbidden-region rule, synthesis matched a simple hazard-deletion baseline in all 90 evaluations; GARV's guarantees remain conditional on the semantic graph, action contract, safety specification, and enforceability of any selected route.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG · cs.RO
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-short.21ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Attention Under Attack: Analog Noise Effects and Mechanistic Vulnerabilities in Transformer Models

Mafizur Rahman, Lijun Qian Prairie View A&M University

Analog in-memory computing (AIMC) offers substantial efficiency gains for transformer inference but introduces hardware-induced noise that can distort attention behavior. Prior studies primarily focus on AIMC evaluations for vision tasks and CNN-based models. They largely overlook how hardware-induced noise perturbs internal attention dynamics in NLP models. In this work, we present the first fine-grained analysis of analog vulnerability in pretrained transformers, examining projection submodules, attention heads, and layer-wise dynamics across multiple NLP tasks. Results show that query (Q), key (K), and value (V) projections are the most sensitive components, while feed-forward layers remain comparatively robust. Also, analog noise yields depth-dependent degradation in higher layers, leading to scattered attention and disrupted token routing. This pre-deployment analysis mitigates potential resource misuse before physical deployment and offers practical guidance for designing noise-resilient analog NLP transformers.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗