跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 14:58 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 15:15 — 2026-11-15 15:15(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 14:58最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 14:56(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.13022

Understanding-First AI Engineering: Purposes, Reference Architecture, and Architectural Patterns for Human Understanding

Liming Zhu, Qinghua Lu, Ming Ding

原文摘要

AI systems can produce reliable results without developing human understanding. However, human understanding remains valuable for shaping subsequent AI-supported work, forming preferences, governing collective choices and satisfying curiosity, even when human participation is unnecessary for correcting errors. We propose understanding-first AI engineering, which treats purpose-specific human understanding as a first-class design principle guiding requirements, design and operation. The purposes of understanding are organised into four complementary rationales: reflective agency, effective action, collective governance and epistemic value. A reference architecture connects production, verification, use, and learning and exploration through shared records, supporting understanding through explanation and participation. Five candidate architectural patterns guide choices about parallel learning, explanatory models, goal exploration, audience-specific views and distributed expertise. Qualitative scenario analysis of two hypothetical use cases demonstrates how the purpose classification, reference architecture and selected patterns guide investigation, participation and decision processes while retaining operational controls. The cases illustrate design consequences and limitations rather than establish empirical effectiveness. The approach makes human understanding an explicit engineering commitment whose justification need not depend on improving the original AI task.

cs.AI · cs.SE

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.09088

When Routine Operations Break Architectural Pattern Relationships in LLM Agent Harnesses

Boming Xia, Qinghua Lu, Dino Sejdinovic, Liming Zhu

原文摘要

LLM agent harnesses distribute tool mediation, state management and safety guardrails across native services, independently written plugins and configuration. Routine operations can change the runtime order or retained state that architectural pattern relationships require, without any code change. We study five relationships associated with the Guardrail Enforcement Point, Autonomy Controller and Blackboard patterns across five released harnesses, analysing a main sample of fourteen independently written plugins. Using PatternOps, our assessment procedure, we trace requirements from pattern descriptions, provider documentation and deployment profiles to the providers that realise them and the records that decide them. We then compare alternative allocations under supported operations. Such operations broke relationships silently: after a plugin was reapplied or an allow rule saved, policy stopped evaluating edits while every plugin stayed active, and a prohibited edit executed. Which alternatives qualified depended on the requirement. Allocations that kept the required order, or kept or rebuilt the needed state, held on their tested paths and operation sequences, while others prevented prohibited effects but missed edits rejected elsewhere. In these harnesses, a pattern relationship is a property of the running system and its history, so architects should evaluate it against the decision paths, state lifetimes and operation sequences their deployments use.

cs.SE · cs.AI

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2606.20631

Harnessing Agent Skills: Architectural Patterns and a Reference Architecture for Skill-Mediated LLM Agents

Boming Xia, Liming Zhu, Zhenchang Xing, Qinghua Lu, Dino Sejdinovic, Xiwei Xu

原文摘要

CONTEXT: Agent skills package reusable behavioural guidance and resources that large language model agents load or apply during a run. Within the agent harness, agent skill harnessing comprises connected architectural responsibilities that govern which skills enter a run, which actions they can cause, and how their use is recorded and informs revision. OBJECTIVES: We identify architectural patterns for agent skill harnessing and organise their responsibilities into a reference architecture that makes these connections explicit. METHODS: A multivocal literature review covered 36 practitioner systems and 51 academic papers; we consolidated practices into patterns and derived the reference architecture from patterns, source evidence, and architectural reasoning. We evaluated the reference architecture by mapping eight systems and applying it in Deep Agents and Hermes Agent. RESULTS: Ten patterns cover skill supply and activation, skill declarations and execution authority, verification and recording of skill use, and run evidence feeding repair and governed revision. The reference architecture organises their responsibilities into four layers (Supply Chain, Mediation, Execution Control, Evidence & Feedback) and two cross-cutting substrates, separating permission determination from enforcement and routing persistent revisions through acceptance. Mapping eight systems showed the first three layers broadly realised and 14 of 15 partial or unestablished ratings in Evidence \& Feedback. Applying the architecture in Deep Agents and Hermes Agent turned requirements into checks that exposed a shell route outside the file-tool rules and a preview--apply mismatch. CONCLUSION: The patterns and reference architecture support comparing implementations and turning requirements into responsibility allocations and checks.

cs.AI · cs.LG